PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XUFN.DE vs. ZPDF.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XUFN.DE vs. ZPDF.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI USA Financials UCITS ETF 1D (XUFN.DE) and SPDR S&P US Financials Select Sector UCITS ETF (ZPDF.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XUFN.DE achieves a -4.69% return, which is significantly lower than ZPDF.DE's -4.18% return.


XUFN.DE

1D
3.20%
1M
1.29%
YTD
-4.69%
6M
-2.50%
1Y
2.59%
3Y*
16.27%
5Y*
9.47%
10Y*

ZPDF.DE

1D
3.08%
1M
1.47%
YTD
-4.18%
6M
-2.10%
1Y
2.43%
3Y*
15.32%
5Y*
9.00%
10Y*
11.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XUFN.DE vs. ZPDF.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XUFN.DE
Xtrackers MSCI USA Financials UCITS ETF 1D
-4.69%3.41%38.69%10.96%-7.89%49.37%-12.55%36.23%-11.22%14.21%
ZPDF.DE
SPDR S&P US Financials Select Sector UCITS ETF
-4.18%3.01%37.12%8.46%-6.12%48.31%-12.18%35.27%-10.30%13.95%

Correlation

The correlation between XUFN.DE and ZPDF.DE is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2017

0.99

The correlation between XUFN.DE and ZPDF.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XUFN.DE vs. ZPDF.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XUFN.DE
XUFN.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
XUFN.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUFN.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUFN.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
XUFN.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUFN.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

ZPDF.DE
ZPDF.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
ZPDF.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZPDF.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZPDF.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
ZPDF.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZPDF.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XUFN.DE vs. ZPDF.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA Financials UCITS ETF 1D (XUFN.DE) and SPDR S&P US Financials Select Sector UCITS ETF (ZPDF.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XUFN.DEZPDF.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.03

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.14

0.14

0.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.33

0.33

0.00

XUFN.DE vs. ZPDF.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XUFN.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.13, which is comparable to the ZPDF.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XUFN.DE and ZPDF.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XUFN.DEZPDF.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

0.12

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.49

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.48

+0.04

Drawdowns

XUFN.DE vs. ZPDF.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XUFN.DE drawdown since its inception was -43.39%, roughly equal to the maximum ZPDF.DE drawdown of -42.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUFN.DE and ZPDF.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XUFN.DEZPDF.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.39%

-42.38%

-1.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.24%

-12.75%

-0.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.03%

-21.67%

-1.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.03%

-21.67%

-1.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.49%

-9.42%

-0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.81%

-7.77%

-0.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.77%

5.55%

+0.22%

Volatility

XUFN.DE vs. ZPDF.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI USA Financials UCITS ETF 1D (XUFN.DE) and SPDR S&P US Financials Select Sector UCITS ETF (ZPDF.DE) have volatilities of 4.40% and 4.24%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XUFN.DEZPDF.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.40%

4.24%

+0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.85%

10.54%

+0.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.00%

14.67%

+0.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.60%

18.20%

+0.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.59%

21.18%

+0.41%

XUFN.DE vs. ZPDF.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XUFN.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than ZPDF.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XUFN.DE vs. ZPDF.DE - Dividend Comparison

XUFN.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, while ZPDF.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
XUFN.DE
Xtrackers MSCI USA Financials UCITS ETF 1D
1.15%1.17%1.08%1.66%2.69%1.25%1.34%3.46%0.66%
ZPDF.DE
SPDR S&P US Financials Select Sector UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, XUFN.DE and ZPDF.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, XUFN.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XUFN.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for ZPDF.DE.

XUFN.DE tracks MSCI USA Financials, while ZPDF.DE tracks S&P Financials Select Sector. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XUFN.DE and 0.15% for ZPDF.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XUFN.DE and ZPDF.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer