XUFB.L vs. XZWG.L

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

XUFB.L (Xtrackers MSCI USA Banks UCITS ETF 1D) and XZWG.L (Xtrackers II ESG Global Government Bond UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XUFB.L is a Financials Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Financials NR USD, while XZWG.L is a Global Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XUFB.L returned 32.67%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for XZWG.L. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XUFB.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XZWG.L.

Performance

XUFB.L vs. XZWG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI USA Banks UCITS ETF 1D (XUFB.L) and Xtrackers II ESG Global Government Bond UCITS ETF (XZWG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

XUFB.L is traded in GBp, while XZWG.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XZWG.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XUFB.L achieves a 8.49% return, which is significantly higher than XZWG.L's 0.80% return.

XUFB.L

• 1D: 0.61%
• 1M: 12.88%
• YTD: 8.49%
• 6M: 7.83%
• 1Y: 32.98%
• 3Y*: 32.67%
• 5Y*: 13.62%
• 10Y*: —

XZWG.L

• 1D: 0.50%
• 1M: 1.40%
• YTD: 0.80%
• 6M: 1.05%
• 1Y: 2.58%
• 3Y*: 0.85%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XUFB.L vs. XZWG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
XUFB.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Banks UCITS ETF 1D	8.49%	23.40%	40.02%	5.21%	-10.18%	-3.85%
XZWG.L Xtrackers II ESG Global Government Bond UCITS ETF	0.80%	0.16%	-2.44%	0.86%	-12.18%	9.93%

Correlation

The correlation between XUFB.L and XZWG.L is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.16
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2021	0.01

The correlation between XUFB.L and XZWG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (all time) to 0.16 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

XUFB.L vs. XZWG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XUFB.L

XUFB.L Risk / Return Rank: 50
XUFB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
XUFB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
XUFB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 50
XUFB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
XUFB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 42

XZWG.L

XZWG.L Risk / Return Rank: 7
XZWG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
XZWG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
XZWG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7
XZWG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
XZWG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XUFB.L vs. XZWG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA Banks UCITS ETF 1D (XUFB.L) and Xtrackers II ESG Global Government Bond UCITS ETF (XZWG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XUFB.L	XZWG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.63	0.33	+1.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.20	0.51	+1.68
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.06	+0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.29	0.48	+1.81
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.07	0.91	+5.16

XUFB.L vs. XZWG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XUFB.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is higher than the XZWG.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XUFB.L and XZWG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XUFB.L vs. XZWG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XUFB.L drawdown since its inception was -47.26%, which is greater than XZWG.L's maximum drawdown of -20.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUFB.L and XZWG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	XUFB.L	XZWG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.26%	-20.41%	-26.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.33%	-4.17%	-10.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.91%	-5.47%	-22.44%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.18%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-15.71%	+15.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.49%	-14.94%	-0.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.42%	2.21%	+3.21%

Volatility

XUFB.L vs. XZWG.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI USA Banks UCITS ETF 1D (XUFB.L) has a higher volatility of 6.52% compared to Xtrackers II ESG Global Government Bond UCITS ETF (XZWG.L) at 2.00%. This indicates that XUFB.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XZWG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XUFB.L	XZWG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.52%	2.00%	+4.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.05%	5.18%	+10.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.28%	6.04%	+14.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.10%	9.98%	+14.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.94%	9.98%	+18.96%

XUFB.L vs. XZWG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XUFB.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than XZWG.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XUFB.L vs. XZWG.L - Dividend Comparison

XUFB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%, less than XZWG.L's 2.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
XUFB.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Banks UCITS ETF 1D	1.62%	1.71%	1.92%	2.54%	3.43%	1.76%
XZWG.L Xtrackers II ESG Global Government Bond UCITS ETF	2.60%	2.42%	2.65%	1.70%	1.11%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XUFB.L and XZWG.L in my portfolio?

XUFB.L and XZWG.L have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XUFB.L or XZWG.L?

On fees, XUFB.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XUFB.L or XZWG.L?

XUFB.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XZWG.L.

What is the main difference between XUFB.L and XZWG.L?

XUFB.L is categorized as Financials Equities, while XZWG.L is Global Bonds. XUFB.L tracks MSCI World/Financials NR USD, while XZWG.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XUFB.L and 0.20% for XZWG.L.