XUFB.L vs. XS7R.L
XUFB.L (Xtrackers MSCI USA Banks UCITS ETF 1D) and XS7R.L (Xtrackers MSCI Europe Financials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C) are both Financials Equities funds tracking the MSCI World/Financials NR USD, from DWS and Xtrackers respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XUFB.L returned 10.89%/yr vs 17.60%/yr for XS7R.L. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XUFB.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XS7R.L.
Performance
XUFB.L vs. XS7R.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XUFB.L achieves a -0.52% return, which is significantly lower than XS7R.L's 2.58% return.
XUFB.L
- 1D
- 4.38%
- 1M
- 1.13%
- YTD
- -0.52%
- 6M
- 2.33%
- 1Y
- 29.10%
- 3Y*
- 27.41%
- 5Y*
- 10.89%
- 10Y*
- —
XS7R.L
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- YTD
- 2.58%
- 6M
- 9.09%
- 1Y
- 21.76%
- 3Y*
- 26.51%
- 5Y*
- 17.60%
- 10Y*
- 10.57%
XUFB.L vs. XS7R.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XUFB.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Banks UCITS ETF 1D | -0.52% | 23.40% | 40.02% | 5.21% | -10.18% | 37.53% | -18.78% | 35.43% | -8.04% |
XS7R.L Xtrackers MSCI Europe Financials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C | 2.58% | 47.44% | 18.33% | 20.38% | 3.19% | 27.29% | -19.81% | 7.94% | -3.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between XUFB.L and XS7R.L is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2018 | 0.59 |
The correlation between XUFB.L and XS7R.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
XUFB.L vs. XS7R.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XUFB.L
XS7R.L
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
XUFB.L
XS7R.L
Basic Materials
XUFB.L
-
XS7R.L
-
Communication Services
XUFB.L
-
XS7R.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
XUFB.L
-
XS7R.L
Consumer Defensive
XUFB.L
-
XS7R.L
-
Energy
XUFB.L
-
XS7R.L
-
Healthcare
XUFB.L
-
XS7R.L
-
Industrials
XUFB.L
-
XS7R.L
Real Estate
XUFB.L
-
XS7R.L
-
Technology
XUFB.L
-
XS7R.L
Utilities
XUFB.L
-
XS7R.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XUFB.L vs. XS7R.L — Risk / Return Rank
XUFB.L
XS7R.L
XUFB.L vs. XS7R.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA Banks UCITS ETF 1D (XUFB.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Europe Financials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XS7R.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XUFB.L | XS7R.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.24 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.92 | 1.93 | -0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.08 | 6.59 | -1.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XUFB.L | XS7R.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.36 | 1.35 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.99 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.10 | +0.34 |
Drawdowns
XUFB.L vs. XS7R.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XUFB.L drawdown since its inception was -41.84%, smaller than the maximum XS7R.L drawdown of -66.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUFB.L and XS7R.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XUFB.L | XS7R.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.84% | -66.04% | +24.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.33% | -11.33% | -3.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.91% | -15.17% | -12.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.18% | -23.60% | -10.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -55.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.68% | -2.39% | -1.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.33% | -26.41% | +14.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.41% | 3.32% | +2.09% |
Volatility
XUFB.L vs. XS7R.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI USA Banks UCITS ETF 1D (XUFB.L) has a higher volatility of 6.55% compared to Xtrackers MSCI Europe Financials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XS7R.L) at 5.07%. This indicates that XUFB.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XS7R.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XUFB.L | XS7R.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.55% | 5.07% | +1.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.77% | 13.42% | +2.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.12% | 16.25% | +3.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.14% | 18.86% | +5.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.85% | 22.52% | +6.33% |
XUFB.L vs. XS7R.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XUFB.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than XS7R.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XUFB.L vs. XS7R.L - Dividend Comparison
XUFB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, while XS7R.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XS7R.L Xtrackers MSCI Europe Financials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XUFB.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Banks UCITS ETF 1D | 1.76% | 1.71% | 1.92% | 2.54% | 3.43% | 1.76% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XUFB.L and XS7R.L have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XUFB.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XUFB.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XS7R.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI World/Financials NR USD. They also come from different issuers: DWS and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XUFB.L and 0.20% for XS7R.L.
Find the right allocation for XUFB.L and XS7R.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer