PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XUFB.L vs. ESIF.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XUFB.L vs. ESIF.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI USA Banks UCITS ETF 1D (XUFB.L) and iShares MSCI Europe Financials Sector UCITS ETF (ESIF.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XUFB.L is traded in GBp, while ESIF.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the ESIF.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XUFB.L achieves a -0.52% return, which is significantly lower than ESIF.L's 3.13% return.


XUFB.L

1D
4.38%
1M
2.37%
YTD
-0.52%
6M
2.50%
1Y
27.56%
3Y*
27.41%
5Y*
10.89%
10Y*

ESIF.L

1D
0.83%
1M
3.69%
YTD
3.13%
6M
9.24%
1Y
25.77%
3Y*
29.07%
5Y*
19.63%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XUFB.L vs. ESIF.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
XUFB.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Banks UCITS ETF 1D
-0.52%23.40%40.02%5.21%-10.18%37.53%5.52%
ESIF.L
iShares MSCI Europe Financials Sector UCITS ETF
3.13%54.55%20.09%18.81%3.59%20.48%2.82%

Correlation

The correlation between XUFB.L and ESIF.L is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2020

0.60

The correlation between XUFB.L and ESIF.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

XUFB.L vs. ESIF.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XUFB.L
ESIF.L

Financial Services

100.0%
96.9%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

0.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

0.4%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

1.0%

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

XUFB.L
100.0%
ESIF.L
96.9%

Basic Materials

XUFB.L

-

ESIF.L

-

Communication Services

XUFB.L

-

ESIF.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

XUFB.L

-

ESIF.L
0.2%

Consumer Defensive

XUFB.L

-

ESIF.L

-

Energy

XUFB.L

-

ESIF.L

-

Healthcare

XUFB.L

-

ESIF.L

-

Industrials

XUFB.L

-

ESIF.L
0.4%

Real Estate

XUFB.L

-

ESIF.L

-

Technology

XUFB.L

-

ESIF.L
1.0%

Utilities

XUFB.L

-

ESIF.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XUFB.L vs. ESIF.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XUFB.L
XUFB.L Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
XUFB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUFB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUFB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
XUFB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUFB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

ESIF.L
ESIF.L Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
ESIF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESIF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESIF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
ESIF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESIF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XUFB.L vs. ESIF.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA Banks UCITS ETF 1D (XUFB.L) and iShares MSCI Europe Financials Sector UCITS ETF (ESIF.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XUFB.LESIF.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.27

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

2.20

-0.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.08

7.65

-2.56

XUFB.L vs. ESIF.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XUFB.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is comparable to the ESIF.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XUFB.L and ESIF.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XUFB.LESIF.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.36

1.50

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

1.07

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

1.17

-0.74

Drawdowns

XUFB.L vs. ESIF.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XUFB.L drawdown since its inception was -41.84%, which is greater than ESIF.L's maximum drawdown of -23.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUFB.L and ESIF.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XUFB.LESIF.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.84%

-23.55%

-18.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.33%

-11.68%

-2.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.91%

-14.26%

-13.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.18%

-23.55%

-10.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.68%

-1.84%

-1.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.33%

-4.12%

-8.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.41%

3.36%

+2.05%

Volatility

XUFB.L vs. ESIF.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI USA Banks UCITS ETF 1D (XUFB.L) has a higher volatility of 6.55% compared to iShares MSCI Europe Financials Sector UCITS ETF (ESIF.L) at 5.32%. This indicates that XUFB.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESIF.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XUFB.LESIF.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.55%

5.32%

+1.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.77%

14.15%

+1.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.12%

17.09%

+3.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.14%

18.32%

+5.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.85%

18.22%

+10.63%

XUFB.L vs. ESIF.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XUFB.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than ESIF.L's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XUFB.L vs. ESIF.L - Dividend Comparison

XUFB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, while ESIF.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
ESIF.L
iShares MSCI Europe Financials Sector UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XUFB.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Banks UCITS ETF 1D
1.76%1.71%1.92%2.54%3.43%1.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


XUFB.L and ESIF.L have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XUFB.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XUFB.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for ESIF.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI World/Financials NR USD. They also come from different issuers: DWS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XUFB.L and 0.18% for ESIF.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XUFB.L and ESIF.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer