PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XUEN.DE vs. IQQH.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XUEN.DE vs. IQQH.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI USA Energy UCITS ETF 1D (XUEN.DE) and iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IQQH.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XUEN.DE achieves a 32.35% return, which is significantly lower than IQQH.DE's 39.28% return.


XUEN.DE

1D
-0.40%
1M
4.10%
YTD
32.35%
6M
28.01%
1Y
43.05%
3Y*
14.05%
5Y*
21.22%
10Y*

IQQH.DE

1D
-1.81%
1M
8.45%
YTD
39.28%
6M
35.95%
1Y
78.04%
3Y*
5.37%
5Y*
2.58%
10Y*
11.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XUEN.DE vs. IQQH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XUEN.DE
Xtrackers MSCI USA Energy UCITS ETF 1D
32.35%-3.28%10.56%-3.66%71.12%65.12%-40.59%12.55%-14.61%11.19%
IQQH.DE
iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
39.28%29.83%-21.49%-22.15%0.84%-17.65%117.65%49.62%-4.26%1.82%

Correlation

The correlation between XUEN.DE and IQQH.DE is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2017

0.27

The correlation between XUEN.DE and IQQH.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XUEN.DE vs. IQQH.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XUEN.DE
XUEN.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
XUEN.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUEN.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUEN.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
XUEN.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUEN.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

IQQH.DE
IQQH.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
IQQH.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQQH.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQQH.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
IQQH.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQQH.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XUEN.DE vs. IQQH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA Energy UCITS ETF 1D (XUEN.DE) and iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IQQH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XUEN.DEIQQH.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.50

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.44

6.29

-3.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.67

19.88

-12.22

XUEN.DE vs. IQQH.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XUEN.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is lower than the IQQH.DE Sharpe Ratio of 3.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XUEN.DE and IQQH.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XUEN.DEIQQH.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.76

3.18

-1.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.10

+0.68

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

-0.01

+0.37

Drawdowns

XUEN.DE vs. IQQH.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XUEN.DE drawdown since its inception was -64.67%, smaller than the maximum IQQH.DE drawdown of -86.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUEN.DE and IQQH.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XUEN.DEIQQH.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.67%

-86.09%

+21.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.12%

-12.32%

-4.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.63%

-44.43%

+17.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.63%

-57.70%

+31.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.21%

-24.01%

+14.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.97%

-59.78%

+42.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.46%

3.90%

+1.56%

Volatility

XUEN.DE vs. IQQH.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI USA Energy UCITS ETF 1D (XUEN.DE) is 7.71%, while iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IQQH.DE) has a volatility of 9.79%. This indicates that XUEN.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IQQH.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XUEN.DEIQQH.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.71%

9.79%

-2.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.26%

18.31%

+1.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.74%

24.37%

-0.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.62%

24.69%

+1.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.68%

25.08%

+4.60%

XUEN.DE vs. IQQH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XUEN.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than IQQH.DE's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

XUEN.DE vs. IQQH.DE - Dividend Comparison

XUEN.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, more than IQQH.DE's 0.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IQQH.DE
iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
0.94%1.53%1.32%1.23%0.83%1.23%0.56%2.89%3.30%4.82%4.72%2.86%
XUEN.DE
Xtrackers MSCI USA Energy UCITS ETF 1D
2.07%2.80%2.64%3.22%3.89%3.12%7.28%2.72%0.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XUEN.DE and IQQH.DE have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XUEN.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XUEN.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for IQQH.DE.

XUEN.DE tracks MSCI USA Energy 20/35 Custom, while IQQH.DE tracks S&P Global Clean Energy. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XUEN.DE and 0.65% for IQQH.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XUEN.DE and IQQH.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer