PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XUEM.DE vs. ZPR5.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XUEM.DE vs. ZPR5.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF 2D (XUEM.DE) and SPDR ICE BofA 0-5 Year EM USD Government Bond UCITS ETF (ZPR5.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XUEM.DE achieves a 3.29% return, which is significantly higher than ZPR5.DE's 2.14% return.


XUEM.DE

1D
-0.07%
1M
1.53%
YTD
3.29%
6M
3.01%
1Y
9.59%
3Y*
6.62%
5Y*
2.28%
10Y*

ZPR5.DE

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.89%
YTD
2.14%
6M
1.74%
1Y
3.56%
3Y*
3.25%
5Y*
3.18%
10Y*
2.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XUEM.DE vs. ZPR5.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
XUEM.DE
Xtrackers USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF 2D
3.29%0.43%11.58%6.72%-14.47%4.14%-6.64%17.85%4.17%
ZPR5.DE
SPDR ICE BofA 0-5 Year EM USD Government Bond UCITS ETF
2.14%-4.12%11.04%2.52%-1.06%7.98%-6.72%8.14%4.46%

Correlation

The correlation between XUEM.DE and ZPR5.DE is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2018

0.69

The correlation between XUEM.DE and ZPR5.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (5 years) to 0.80 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XUEM.DE vs. ZPR5.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XUEM.DE
XUEM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
XUEM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUEM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUEM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
XUEM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUEM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

ZPR5.DE
ZPR5.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
ZPR5.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZPR5.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZPR5.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
ZPR5.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZPR5.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XUEM.DE vs. ZPR5.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF 2D (XUEM.DE) and SPDR ICE BofA 0-5 Year EM USD Government Bond UCITS ETF (ZPR5.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XUEM.DEZPR5.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.11

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.52

1.11

+2.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.09

2.73

+7.37

XUEM.DE vs. ZPR5.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XUEM.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is higher than the ZPR5.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XUEM.DE and ZPR5.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XUEM.DEZPR5.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.64

0.65

+0.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

0.45

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.39

-0.11

Drawdowns

XUEM.DE vs. ZPR5.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XUEM.DE drawdown since its inception was -26.83%, which is greater than ZPR5.DE's maximum drawdown of -14.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUEM.DE and ZPR5.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XUEM.DEZPR5.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.83%

-14.48%

-12.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.72%

-3.21%

+0.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.45%

-9.72%

-3.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.85%

-9.92%

-7.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.82%

-4.28%

+1.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.35%

-4.88%

-5.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.95%

1.30%

-0.35%

Volatility

XUEM.DE vs. ZPR5.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF 2D (XUEM.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.06% compared to SPDR ICE BofA 0-5 Year EM USD Government Bond UCITS ETF (ZPR5.DE) at 0.96%. This indicates that XUEM.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZPR5.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XUEM.DEZPR5.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.06%

0.96%

+0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.83%

3.56%

+0.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.81%

5.43%

+0.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.74%

7.04%

+1.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.44%

7.20%

+3.24%

XUEM.DE vs. ZPR5.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XUEM.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than ZPR5.DE's 0.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

XUEM.DE vs. ZPR5.DE - Dividend Comparison

XUEM.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.46%, less than ZPR5.DE's 4.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XUEM.DE
Xtrackers USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF 2D
4.46%4.97%6.06%5.00%5.62%6.82%4.07%0.54%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZPR5.DE
SPDR ICE BofA 0-5 Year EM USD Government Bond UCITS ETF
4.83%5.10%4.16%3.16%2.54%2.63%3.53%3.34%2.73%3.18%2.72%1.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


XUEM.DE and ZPR5.DE have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XUEM.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XUEM.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for ZPR5.DE.

XUEM.DE tracks JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD, while ZPR5.DE tracks ICE BofA Emerging Markets USD Government Bond 0-5 ex-144a. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XUEM.DE and 0.42% for ZPR5.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XUEM.DE and ZPR5.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer