PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XUEM.DE vs. 36B1.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XUEM.DE vs. 36B1.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF 2D (XUEM.DE) and iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF (36B1.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XUEM.DE achieves a 3.29% return, which is significantly higher than 36B1.DE's 2.43% return.


XUEM.DE

1D
-0.07%
1M
1.53%
YTD
3.29%
6M
3.01%
1Y
9.59%
3Y*
6.62%
5Y*
2.28%
10Y*

36B1.DE

1D
0.13%
1M
1.52%
YTD
2.43%
6M
2.12%
1Y
7.79%
3Y*
5.51%
5Y*
2.20%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XUEM.DE vs. 36B1.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
XUEM.DE
Xtrackers USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF 2D
3.29%0.43%11.58%6.72%-14.47%4.14%-6.64%10.34%
36B1.DE
iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF
2.43%-0.10%10.86%5.55%-13.71%6.46%-4.35%11.07%

Correlation

The correlation between XUEM.DE and 36B1.DE is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2019

0.94

The correlation between XUEM.DE and 36B1.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XUEM.DE vs. 36B1.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XUEM.DE
XUEM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
XUEM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUEM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUEM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
XUEM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUEM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

36B1.DE
36B1.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
36B1.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
36B1.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
36B1.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
36B1.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
36B1.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XUEM.DE vs. 36B1.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF 2D (XUEM.DE) and iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF (36B1.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XUEM.DE36B1.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.25

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.52

2.63

+0.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.09

6.72

+3.37

XUEM.DE vs. 36B1.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XUEM.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the 36B1.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XUEM.DE and 36B1.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XUEM.DE36B1.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.64

1.32

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

0.26

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.23

+0.05

Drawdowns

XUEM.DE vs. 36B1.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XUEM.DE drawdown since its inception was -26.83%, which is greater than 36B1.DE's maximum drawdown of -22.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUEM.DE and 36B1.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XUEM.DE36B1.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.83%

-22.46%

-4.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.72%

-2.95%

+0.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.45%

-12.43%

-1.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.85%

-16.34%

-1.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.82%

-1.33%

-1.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.35%

-8.64%

-1.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.95%

1.16%

-0.21%

Volatility

XUEM.DE vs. 36B1.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF 2D (XUEM.DE) is 1.06%, while iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF (36B1.DE) has a volatility of 1.21%. This indicates that XUEM.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 36B1.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XUEM.DE36B1.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.06%

1.21%

-0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.83%

3.81%

+0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.81%

5.87%

-0.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.74%

8.41%

+0.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.44%

9.55%

+0.89%

XUEM.DE vs. 36B1.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XUEM.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than 36B1.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

XUEM.DE vs. 36B1.DE - Dividend Comparison

XUEM.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.46%, less than 36B1.DE's 4.93% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
36B1.DE
iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF
4.93%5.22%4.96%5.09%5.00%4.57%3.40%4.19%
XUEM.DE
Xtrackers USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF 2D
4.46%4.97%6.06%5.00%5.62%6.82%4.07%0.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, XUEM.DE and 36B1.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, XUEM.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XUEM.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for 36B1.DE.

XUEM.DE tracks JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD, while 36B1.DE tracks JP Morgan ESG EMBI Global Diversified. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XUEM.DE and 0.45% for 36B1.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XUEM.DE and 36B1.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer