XUEB.DE vs. IS02.DE
XUEB.DE (Xtrackers II USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF 2C) and IS02.DE (iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds - XUEB.DE tracks the JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD while IS02.DE tracks the JP Morgan EMBI Global Core. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XUEB.DE returned 2.85%/yr vs 2.88%/yr for IS02.DE. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XUEB.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for IS02.DE.
Performance
XUEB.DE vs. IS02.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XUEB.DE achieves a 3.66% return, which is significantly higher than IS02.DE's 2.97% return.
XUEB.DE
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 1.69%
- YTD
- 3.66%
- 6M
- 3.38%
- 1Y
- 10.40%
- 3Y*
- 7.25%
- 5Y*
- 2.85%
- 10Y*
- —
IS02.DE
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 1.71%
- YTD
- 2.97%
- 6M
- 2.72%
- 1Y
- 9.38%
- 3Y*
- 6.78%
- 5Y*
- 2.88%
- 10Y*
- —
XUEB.DE vs. IS02.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XUEB.DE Xtrackers II USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF 2C | 3.66% | 1.23% | 11.99% | 7.34% | -14.37% | 5.65% | -0.15% |
IS02.DE iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) | 2.97% | 1.10% | 11.83% | 6.71% | -13.12% | 5.72% | 0.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between XUEB.DE and IS02.DE is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2020 | 0.95 |
The correlation between XUEB.DE and IS02.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XUEB.DE vs. IS02.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XUEB.DE
IS02.DE
XUEB.DE vs. IS02.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF 2C (XUEB.DE) and iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS02.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XUEB.DE | IS02.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.30 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.83 | 3.11 | +0.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.83 | 8.98 | +1.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XUEB.DE | IS02.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.75 | 1.57 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.33 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.27 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
XUEB.DE vs. IS02.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XUEB.DE drawdown since its inception was -17.41%, which is greater than IS02.DE's maximum drawdown of -16.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUEB.DE and IS02.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XUEB.DE | IS02.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.41% | -16.21% | -1.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.70% | -3.00% | +0.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.41% | -12.85% | -0.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.41% | -16.21% | -1.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.40% | 0.00% | -0.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.25% | -5.92% | -0.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.96% | 1.04% | -0.08% |
Volatility
XUEB.DE vs. IS02.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers II USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF 2C (XUEB.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.29% compared to iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS02.DE) at 1.19%. This indicates that XUEB.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IS02.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XUEB.DE | IS02.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.29% | 1.19% | +0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.95% | 3.97% | -0.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.93% | 5.94% | -0.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.74% | 8.53% | +0.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.56% | 8.34% | +0.22% |
XUEB.DE vs. IS02.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XUEB.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than IS02.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
XUEB.DE vs. IS02.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XUEB.DE nor IS02.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, XUEB.DE and IS02.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, XUEB.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XUEB.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for IS02.DE.
XUEB.DE tracks JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD, while IS02.DE tracks JP Morgan EMBI Global Core. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XUEB.DE and 0.45% for IS02.DE.
Find the right allocation for XUEB.DE and IS02.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer