IS02.DE vs. XUEM.DE
IS02.DE (iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Acc)) and XUEM.DE (Xtrackers USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF 2D) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds - IS02.DE tracks the JP Morgan EMBI Global Core while XUEM.DE tracks the JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IS02.DE returned 2.88%/yr vs 2.28%/yr for XUEM.DE. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IS02.DE charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XUEM.DE.
Performance
IS02.DE vs. XUEM.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IS02.DE achieves a 2.97% return, which is significantly lower than XUEM.DE's 3.29% return.
IS02.DE
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 1.71%
- YTD
- 2.97%
- 6M
- 2.72%
- 1Y
- 9.38%
- 3Y*
- 6.78%
- 5Y*
- 2.88%
- 10Y*
- —
XUEM.DE
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 1.53%
- YTD
- 3.29%
- 6M
- 3.01%
- 1Y
- 9.59%
- 3Y*
- 6.62%
- 5Y*
- 2.28%
- 10Y*
- —
IS02.DE vs. XUEM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IS02.DE iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) | 2.97% | 1.10% | 11.83% | 6.71% | -13.12% | 5.72% | 0.08% |
XUEM.DE Xtrackers USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF 2D | 3.29% | 0.43% | 11.58% | 6.72% | -14.47% | 4.14% | -0.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between IS02.DE and XUEM.DE is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2020 | 0.95 |
The correlation between IS02.DE and XUEM.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IS02.DE vs. XUEM.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IS02.DE
XUEM.DE
IS02.DE vs. XUEM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS02.DE) and Xtrackers USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF 2D (XUEM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IS02.DE | XUEM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.31 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.11 | 3.52 | -0.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.98 | 10.09 | -1.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IS02.DE | XUEM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.57 | 1.64 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 | 0.26 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.28 | 0.00 |
Drawdowns
IS02.DE vs. XUEM.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IS02.DE drawdown since its inception was -16.21%, smaller than the maximum XUEM.DE drawdown of -26.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IS02.DE and XUEM.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IS02.DE | XUEM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.21% | -26.83% | +10.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.00% | -2.72% | -0.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.85% | -13.45% | +0.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.21% | -17.85% | +1.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.82% | +2.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.92% | -10.35% | +4.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.04% | 0.95% | +0.09% |
Volatility
IS02.DE vs. XUEM.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS02.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.19% compared to Xtrackers USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF 2D (XUEM.DE) at 1.06%. This indicates that IS02.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XUEM.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IS02.DE | XUEM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.19% | 1.06% | +0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.97% | 3.83% | +0.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.94% | 5.81% | +0.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.53% | 8.74% | -0.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.34% | 10.44% | -2.10% |
IS02.DE vs. XUEM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IS02.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than XUEM.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
IS02.DE vs. XUEM.DE - Dividend Comparison
IS02.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XUEM.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.46%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IS02.DE iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XUEM.DE Xtrackers USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF 2D | 4.46% | 4.97% | 6.06% | 5.00% | 5.62% | 6.82% | 4.07% | 0.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, IS02.DE and XUEM.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, XUEM.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XUEM.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for IS02.DE.
IS02.DE tracks JP Morgan EMBI Global Core, while XUEM.DE tracks JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for IS02.DE and 0.25% for XUEM.DE.
Find the right allocation for IS02.DE and XUEM.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer