XUCS.DE vs. CEMG.DE
XUCS.DE (Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1D) and CEMG.DE (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Consumer Growth UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Consumer Staples Equities funds - XUCS.DE tracks the MSCI USA Consumer Staples while CEMG.DE tracks the Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XUCS.DE returned 8.14%/yr vs -2.27%/yr for CEMG.DE. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XUCS.DE charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for CEMG.DE.
Performance
XUCS.DE vs. CEMG.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XUCS.DE achieves a 7.99% return, which is significantly higher than CEMG.DE's -7.03% return.
XUCS.DE
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -1.95%
- YTD
- 7.99%
- 6M
- 7.83%
- 1Y
- 0.97%
- 3Y*
- 5.59%
- 5Y*
- 8.14%
- 10Y*
- —
CEMG.DE
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -0.30%
- YTD
- -7.03%
- 6M
- -7.84%
- 1Y
- -8.22%
- 3Y*
- 3.00%
- 5Y*
- -2.27%
- 10Y*
- 3.56%
XUCS.DE vs. CEMG.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XUCS.DE Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1D | 7.99% | -7.97% | 21.47% | -1.77% | 5.50% | 27.57% | -0.49% | 29.85% | -4.67% | 4.10% |
CEMG.DE iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Consumer Growth UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -7.03% | 0.86% | 16.93% | 1.69% | -16.08% | -1.07% | 11.30% | 25.51% | -16.68% | 5.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between XUCS.DE and CEMG.DE is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2017 | 0.26 |
The correlation between XUCS.DE and CEMG.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XUCS.DE vs. CEMG.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XUCS.DE
CEMG.DE
XUCS.DE vs. CEMG.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1D (XUCS.DE) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Consumer Growth UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CEMG.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XUCS.DE | CEMG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 0.91 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.12 | -0.58 | +0.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.23 | -1.23 | +1.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XUCS.DE | CEMG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 | -0.64 | +0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | -0.12 | +0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.19 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 0.22 | +0.37 |
Drawdowns
XUCS.DE vs. CEMG.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XUCS.DE drawdown since its inception was -23.46%, smaller than the maximum CEMG.DE drawdown of -33.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUCS.DE and CEMG.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XUCS.DE | CEMG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.46% | -33.94% | +10.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.36% | -14.05% | +5.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.64% | -20.18% | +4.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.64% | -31.08% | +15.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.94% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.31% | -18.75% | +11.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.50% | -12.26% | +6.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.17% | 6.68% | -2.51% |
Volatility
XUCS.DE vs. CEMG.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1D (XUCS.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.10% compared to iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Consumer Growth UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CEMG.DE) at 4.37%. This indicates that XUCS.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CEMG.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XUCS.DE | CEMG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.10% | 4.37% | +1.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.47% | 10.24% | +1.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.08% | 12.88% | +1.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.41% | 18.54% | -5.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.50% | 18.33% | -3.83% |
XUCS.DE vs. CEMG.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XUCS.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than CEMG.DE's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
XUCS.DE vs. CEMG.DE - Dividend Comparison
XUCS.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%, while CEMG.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEMG.DE iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Consumer Growth UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XUCS.DE Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1D | 1.94% | 2.17% | 2.09% | 3.35% | 3.11% | 1.88% | 3.02% | 2.37% | 0.78% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XUCS.DE and CEMG.DE have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XUCS.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XUCS.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for CEMG.DE.
XUCS.DE tracks MSCI USA Consumer Staples, while CEMG.DE tracks Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XUCS.DE and 0.60% for CEMG.DE.
Find the right allocation for XUCS.DE and CEMG.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer