CEMG.DE vs. WCOD.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Consumer Growth UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CEMG.DE) and SPDR MSCI World Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF (WCOD.L).
CEMG.DE and WCOD.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CEMG.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR. It was launched on Jun 6, 2014. WCOD.L is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR. It was launched on Apr 29, 2016. Both CEMG.DE and WCOD.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
CEMG.DE vs. WCOD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CEMG.DE vs. WCOD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEMG.DE iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Consumer Growth UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -6.84% | 0.86% | 16.93% | 1.69% | -16.08% | -1.07% | 11.30% | 25.51% | -16.68% | 23.33% |
WCOD.L SPDR MSCI World Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF | -8.25% | -4.18% | 29.16% | 31.39% | -30.04% | 28.25% | 24.06% | 29.66% | -1.69% | 7.25% |
Different Trading Currencies
CEMG.DE is traded in EUR, while WCOD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the WCOD.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEMG.DE achieves a -6.84% return, which is significantly higher than WCOD.L's -8.25% return.
CEMG.DE
- 1D
- 1.54%
- 1M
- -4.55%
- YTD
- -6.84%
- 6M
- -10.96%
- 1Y
- -7.04%
- 3Y*
- 1.78%
- 5Y*
- -2.55%
- 10Y*
- 3.77%
WCOD.L
- 1D
- 2.81%
- 1M
- -2.94%
- YTD
- -8.25%
- 6M
- -7.21%
- 1Y
- 1.12%
- 3Y*
- 9.02%
- 5Y*
- 4.26%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CEMG.DE vs. WCOD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEMG.DE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than WCOD.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CEMG.DE vs. WCOD.L — Risk / Return Rank
CEMG.DE
WCOD.L
CEMG.DE vs. WCOD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Consumer Growth UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CEMG.DE) and SPDR MSCI World Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF (WCOD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CEMG.DE | WCOD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.44 | 0.05 | -0.49 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.50 | 0.22 | -0.72 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.03 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.48 | 0.07 | -0.55 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.25 | 0.20 | -1.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CEMG.DE | WCOD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.44 | 0.05 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.14 | 0.25 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.22 | 0.74 | -0.51 |
Correlation
The correlation between CEMG.DE and WCOD.L is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CEMG.DE vs. WCOD.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CEMG.DE nor WCOD.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
CEMG.DE vs. WCOD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEMG.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.94%, roughly equal to the maximum WCOD.L drawdown of -34.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEMG.DE and WCOD.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEMG.DE | WCOD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.94% | -36.26% | +2.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.05% | -16.19% | +2.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.08% | -36.26% | +5.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.94% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.59% | -12.77% | -5.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.18% | -8.50% | -3.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.35% | 4.88% | +0.47% |
Volatility
CEMG.DE vs. WCOD.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Consumer Growth UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CEMG.DE) is 5.38%, while SPDR MSCI World Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF (WCOD.L) has a volatility of 7.34%. This indicates that CEMG.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WCOD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CEMG.DE | WCOD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.38% | 7.34% | -1.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.70% | 12.57% | -2.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.05% | 20.68% | -4.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.48% | 23.34% | -4.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.31% | 24.74% | -6.43% |