XUCM.L vs. XWTS.L
XUCM.L (Xtrackers MSCI USA Communication Services UCITS ETF 1D) and XWTS.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Communication Services UCITS ETF 1C) are both Communications Equities funds from Xtrackers tracking the MSCI World/Comm Services NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XUCM.L returned 10.07%/yr vs 10.80%/yr for XWTS.L. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. XUCM.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XWTS.L.
Performance
XUCM.L vs. XWTS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XUCM.L achieves a 0.94% return, which is significantly lower than XWTS.L's 3.66% return.
XUCM.L
- 1D
- 1.58%
- 1M
- -2.84%
- YTD
- 0.94%
- 6M
- 0.75%
- 1Y
- 19.34%
- 3Y*
- 25.78%
- 5Y*
- 10.07%
- 10Y*
- —
XWTS.L
- 1D
- 1.04%
- 1M
- -1.36%
- YTD
- 3.66%
- 6M
- 3.22%
- 1Y
- 24.71%
- 3Y*
- 26.85%
- 5Y*
- 10.80%
- 10Y*
- 10.80%
XUCM.L vs. XWTS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XUCM.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Communication Services UCITS ETF 1D | 0.94% | 24.58% | 37.72% | 55.75% | -41.71% | 17.15% |
XWTS.L Xtrackers MSCI World Communication Services UCITS ETF 1C | 3.66% | 28.97% | 34.65% | 47.43% | -37.76% | 13.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between XUCM.L and XWTS.L is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2021 | 0.98 |
The correlation between XUCM.L and XWTS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
XUCM.L vs. XWTS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XUCM.L
XWTS.L
Communication Services
Technology
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
-
Communication Services
XUCM.L
XWTS.L
Technology
XUCM.L
XWTS.L
Basic Materials
XUCM.L
-
XWTS.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
XUCM.L
-
XWTS.L
Consumer Defensive
XUCM.L
-
XWTS.L
-
Energy
XUCM.L
-
XWTS.L
-
Financial Services
XUCM.L
-
XWTS.L
-
Healthcare
XUCM.L
-
XWTS.L
-
Industrials
XUCM.L
-
XWTS.L
-
Real Estate
XUCM.L
-
XWTS.L
Utilities
XUCM.L
-
XWTS.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XUCM.L vs. XWTS.L — Risk / Return Rank
XUCM.L
XWTS.L
XUCM.L vs. XWTS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA Communication Services UCITS ETF 1D (XUCM.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Communication Services UCITS ETF 1C (XWTS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XUCM.L | XWTS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.29 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.92 | 2.17 | -0.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.78 | 8.66 | -1.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XUCM.L | XWTS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.32 | 1.69 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | 0.57 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.60 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.61 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
XUCM.L vs. XWTS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XUCM.L drawdown since its inception was -48.70%, which is greater than XWTS.L's maximum drawdown of -44.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUCM.L and XWTS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XUCM.L | XWTS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.70% | -44.71% | -3.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.01% | -11.35% | +1.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.86% | -18.95% | -0.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.70% | -44.71% | -3.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.64% | -3.20% | -1.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.77% | -8.84% | -4.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.85% | 2.85% | 0.00% |
Volatility
XUCM.L vs. XWTS.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI USA Communication Services UCITS ETF 1D (XUCM.L) has a higher volatility of 4.52% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Communication Services UCITS ETF 1C (XWTS.L) at 4.13%. This indicates that XUCM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XWTS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XUCM.L | XWTS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.52% | 4.13% | +0.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.57% | 10.57% | 0.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.63% | 14.57% | +0.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.44% | 19.07% | +1.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.29% | 17.97% | +2.32% |
XUCM.L vs. XWTS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XUCM.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than XWTS.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XUCM.L vs. XWTS.L - Dividend Comparison
XUCM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%, while XWTS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XUCM.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Communication Services UCITS ETF 1D | 0.71% | 0.72% | 0.63% | 0.58% | 0.53% |
XWTS.L Xtrackers MSCI World Communication Services UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, XUCM.L and XWTS.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, XUCM.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XUCM.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XWTS.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI World/Comm Services NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XUCM.L and 0.25% for XWTS.L.
Find the right allocation for XUCM.L and XWTS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer