XUCM.L vs. XDWH.L
XUCM.L (Xtrackers MSCI USA Communication Services UCITS ETF 1D) and XDWH.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - XUCM.L is a Communications Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Comm Services NR USD, while XDWH.L is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XUCM.L returned 10.07%/yr vs 4.54%/yr for XDWH.L. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XUCM.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XDWH.L.
Performance
XUCM.L vs. XDWH.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XUCM.L achieves a 0.94% return, which is significantly higher than XDWH.L's -2.74% return.
XUCM.L
- 1D
- 1.58%
- 1M
- -2.84%
- YTD
- 0.94%
- 6M
- 0.75%
- 1Y
- 19.34%
- 3Y*
- 25.78%
- 5Y*
- 10.07%
- 10Y*
- —
XDWH.L
- 1D
- 2.99%
- 1M
- 3.25%
- YTD
- -2.74%
- 6M
- -1.64%
- 1Y
- 11.56%
- 3Y*
- 5.50%
- 5Y*
- 4.54%
- 10Y*
- 7.85%
XUCM.L vs. XDWH.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XUCM.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Communication Services UCITS ETF 1D | 0.94% | 24.58% | 37.72% | 55.75% | -41.71% | 17.15% |
XDWH.L Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C | -2.74% | 15.25% | 0.75% | 3.81% | -5.42% | 16.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between XUCM.L and XDWH.L is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2021 | 0.42 |
The correlation between XUCM.L and XDWH.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (1 year) to 0.42 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XUCM.L vs. XDWH.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XUCM.L
XDWH.L
Communication Services
-
Technology
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Communication Services
XUCM.L
XDWH.L
-
Technology
XUCM.L
XDWH.L
-
Basic Materials
XUCM.L
-
XDWH.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
XUCM.L
-
XDWH.L
-
Consumer Defensive
XUCM.L
-
XDWH.L
Energy
XUCM.L
-
XDWH.L
-
Financial Services
XUCM.L
-
XDWH.L
-
Healthcare
XUCM.L
-
XDWH.L
Industrials
XUCM.L
-
XDWH.L
-
Real Estate
XUCM.L
-
XDWH.L
-
Utilities
XUCM.L
-
XDWH.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XUCM.L vs. XDWH.L — Risk / Return Rank
XUCM.L
XDWH.L
XUCM.L vs. XDWH.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA Communication Services UCITS ETF 1D (XUCM.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XUCM.L | XDWH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.15 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.92 | 1.11 | +0.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.78 | 2.80 | +3.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XUCM.L | XDWH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.32 | 0.79 | +0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | 0.32 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.57 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
XUCM.L vs. XDWH.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XUCM.L drawdown since its inception was -48.70%, which is greater than XDWH.L's maximum drawdown of -26.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUCM.L and XDWH.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XUCM.L | XDWH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.70% | -26.24% | -22.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.01% | -10.39% | +0.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.86% | -19.28% | -0.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.70% | -19.28% | -29.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -26.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.64% | -5.82% | +1.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.77% | -4.98% | -8.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.85% | 4.12% | -1.27% |
Volatility
XUCM.L vs. XDWH.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI USA Communication Services UCITS ETF 1D (XUCM.L) is 4.52%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.L) has a volatility of 4.80%. This indicates that XUCM.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDWH.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XUCM.L | XDWH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.52% | 4.80% | -0.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.57% | 10.77% | -0.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.63% | 14.57% | +0.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.44% | 14.18% | +6.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.29% | 14.97% | +5.32% |
XUCM.L vs. XDWH.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XUCM.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than XDWH.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XUCM.L vs. XDWH.L - Dividend Comparison
XUCM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%, while XDWH.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDWH.L Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XUCM.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Communication Services UCITS ETF 1D | 0.71% | 0.72% | 0.63% | 0.58% | 0.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XUCM.L and XDWH.L have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XUCM.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XUCM.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDWH.L.
XUCM.L is categorized as Communications Equities, while XDWH.L is Health & Biotech Equities. XUCM.L tracks MSCI World/Comm Services NR USD, while XDWH.L tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XUCM.L and 0.25% for XDWH.L.
Find the right allocation for XUCM.L and XDWH.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer