PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XUCM.DE vs. SC0Q.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XUCM.DE vs. SC0Q.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI USA Communication Services UCITS ETF 1D (XUCM.DE) and Invesco European Telecoms Sector UCITS ETF (SC0Q.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XUCM.DE achieves a 2.35% return, which is significantly lower than SC0Q.DE's 28.44% return.


XUCM.DE

1D
1.39%
1M
-2.88%
YTD
2.35%
6M
-0.01%
1Y
15.97%
3Y*
22.36%
5Y*
11.09%
10Y*

SC0Q.DE

1D
-1.92%
1M
2.81%
YTD
28.44%
6M
32.46%
1Y
28.61%
3Y*
21.31%
5Y*
10.30%
10Y*
3.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XUCM.DE vs. SC0Q.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
XUCM.DE
Xtrackers MSCI USA Communication Services UCITS ETF 1D
2.35%10.39%45.87%50.47%-38.22%26.16%
SC0Q.DE
Invesco European Telecoms Sector UCITS ETF
28.44%18.07%18.98%5.91%-14.81%9.22%

Correlation

The correlation between XUCM.DE and SC0Q.DE is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2021

0.26

The correlation between XUCM.DE and SC0Q.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XUCM.DE vs. SC0Q.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XUCM.DE
XUCM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
XUCM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUCM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUCM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
XUCM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUCM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

SC0Q.DE
SC0Q.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
SC0Q.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SC0Q.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
SC0Q.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
SC0Q.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
SC0Q.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XUCM.DE vs. SC0Q.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA Communication Services UCITS ETF 1D (XUCM.DE) and Invesco European Telecoms Sector UCITS ETF (SC0Q.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XUCM.DESC0Q.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.34

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.04

3.71

-1.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.97

8.87

-1.90

XUCM.DE vs. SC0Q.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XUCM.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is lower than the SC0Q.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XUCM.DE and SC0Q.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XUCM.DESC0Q.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.21

1.94

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.72

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.33

+0.34

Drawdowns

XUCM.DE vs. SC0Q.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XUCM.DE drawdown since its inception was -40.85%, smaller than the maximum SC0Q.DE drawdown of -48.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUCM.DE and SC0Q.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XUCM.DESC0Q.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.85%

-48.95%

+8.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.34%

-7.80%

-0.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.07%

-9.73%

-15.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.85%

-21.66%

-19.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.13%

-2.05%

-2.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.96%

-19.11%

+8.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.45%

3.14%

-0.69%

Volatility

XUCM.DE vs. SC0Q.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI USA Communication Services UCITS ETF 1D (XUCM.DE) is 4.25%, while Invesco European Telecoms Sector UCITS ETF (SC0Q.DE) has a volatility of 6.36%. This indicates that XUCM.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SC0Q.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XUCM.DESC0Q.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.25%

6.36%

-2.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.71%

12.07%

-2.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.07%

14.95%

-0.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.62%

14.07%

+5.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.44%

16.00%

+3.44%

XUCM.DE vs. SC0Q.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XUCM.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than SC0Q.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XUCM.DE vs. SC0Q.DE - Dividend Comparison

XUCM.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, while SC0Q.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
SC0Q.DE
Invesco European Telecoms Sector UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XUCM.DE
Xtrackers MSCI USA Communication Services UCITS ETF 1D
0.70%0.77%0.60%0.60%0.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


XUCM.DE and SC0Q.DE have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XUCM.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XUCM.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SC0Q.DE.

XUCM.DE tracks MSCI World/Comm Services NR USD, while SC0Q.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Optimised Telecommunications. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XUCM.DE and 0.20% for SC0Q.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XUCM.DE and SC0Q.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer