PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SC0Q.DE vs. ZPDK.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SC0Q.DE vs. ZPDK.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco European Telecoms Sector UCITS ETF (SC0Q.DE) and SPDR S&P U.S. Communication Services Select Sector UCITS ETF (ZPDK.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SC0Q.DE achieves a 28.44% return, which is significantly higher than ZPDK.DE's 3.41% return.


SC0Q.DE

1D
-1.92%
1M
3.62%
YTD
28.44%
6M
31.77%
1Y
29.09%
3Y*
21.31%
5Y*
10.30%
10Y*
3.62%

ZPDK.DE

1D
1.45%
1M
-2.27%
YTD
3.41%
6M
2.07%
1Y
18.77%
3Y*
22.06%
5Y*
11.35%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SC0Q.DE vs. ZPDK.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SC0Q.DE
Invesco European Telecoms Sector UCITS ETF
28.44%18.07%18.98%5.91%-14.81%15.27%-14.17%4.16%-0.24%
ZPDK.DE
SPDR S&P U.S. Communication Services Select Sector UCITS ETF
3.41%13.23%39.09%48.24%-33.43%26.14%15.70%33.80%-15.00%

Correlation

The correlation between SC0Q.DE and ZPDK.DE is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2018

0.36

Over the past year, the correlation between SC0Q.DE and ZPDK.DE has dropped to 0.08 - well below their long-term average of 0.36, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SC0Q.DE vs. ZPDK.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SC0Q.DE
SC0Q.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
SC0Q.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SC0Q.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
SC0Q.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
SC0Q.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
SC0Q.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

ZPDK.DE
ZPDK.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
ZPDK.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZPDK.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZPDK.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
ZPDK.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZPDK.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SC0Q.DE vs. ZPDK.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco European Telecoms Sector UCITS ETF (SC0Q.DE) and SPDR S&P U.S. Communication Services Select Sector UCITS ETF (ZPDK.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SC0Q.DEZPDK.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.23

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.71

2.25

+1.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.87

7.91

+0.96

SC0Q.DE vs. ZPDK.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SC0Q.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is higher than the ZPDK.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SC0Q.DE and ZPDK.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SC0Q.DEZPDK.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.94

1.34

+0.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.60

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.68

-0.36

Drawdowns

SC0Q.DE vs. ZPDK.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SC0Q.DE drawdown since its inception was -48.95%, which is greater than ZPDK.DE's maximum drawdown of -36.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SC0Q.DE and ZPDK.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SC0Q.DEZPDK.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.95%

-36.98%

-11.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.80%

-8.30%

+0.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.73%

-21.88%

+12.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.66%

-36.98%

+15.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.05%

-4.21%

+2.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.11%

-7.91%

-11.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.14%

2.37%

+0.77%

Volatility

SC0Q.DE vs. ZPDK.DE - Volatility Comparison

Invesco European Telecoms Sector UCITS ETF (SC0Q.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.36% compared to SPDR S&P U.S. Communication Services Select Sector UCITS ETF (ZPDK.DE) at 4.24%. This indicates that SC0Q.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZPDK.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SC0Q.DEZPDK.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.36%

4.24%

+2.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.07%

9.60%

+2.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.95%

13.93%

+1.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.07%

18.59%

-4.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.00%

19.48%

-3.48%

SC0Q.DE vs. ZPDK.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SC0Q.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than ZPDK.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SC0Q.DE vs. ZPDK.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither SC0Q.DE nor ZPDK.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SC0Q.DE and ZPDK.DE have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZPDK.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZPDK.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SC0Q.DE.

SC0Q.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Optimised Telecommunications, while ZPDK.DE tracks S&P Communication Services Select Sector Daily Capped 25/20. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SC0Q.DE and 0.15% for ZPDK.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SC0Q.DE and ZPDK.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer