PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XUCD.DE vs. WELJ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XUCD.DE vs. WELJ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1D (XUCD.DE) and Amundi S&P Global Consumer Discretionary ESG UCITS ETF EUR Acc (WELJ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XUCD.DE achieves a 0.22% return, which is significantly higher than WELJ.DE's -1.85% return.


XUCD.DE

1D
0.28%
1M
-0.63%
YTD
0.22%
6M
0.35%
1Y
10.06%
3Y*
14.31%
5Y*
8.69%
10Y*

WELJ.DE

1D
0.21%
1M
-0.53%
YTD
-1.85%
6M
-2.00%
1Y
6.67%
3Y*
9.08%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XUCD.DE vs. WELJ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XUCD.DE
Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1D
0.22%-5.02%38.90%39.32%-17.27%
WELJ.DE
Amundi S&P Global Consumer Discretionary ESG UCITS ETF EUR Acc
-1.85%-4.79%29.73%30.43%-8.02%

Correlation

The correlation between XUCD.DE and WELJ.DE is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2022

0.94

The correlation between XUCD.DE and WELJ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XUCD.DE vs. WELJ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XUCD.DE
XUCD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
XUCD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUCD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUCD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
XUCD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUCD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

WELJ.DE
WELJ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
WELJ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WELJ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
WELJ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
WELJ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
WELJ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XUCD.DE vs. WELJ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1D (XUCD.DE) and Amundi S&P Global Consumer Discretionary ESG UCITS ETF EUR Acc (WELJ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XUCD.DEWELJ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.08

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.73

0.44

+0.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.00

1.20

+0.80

XUCD.DE vs. WELJ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XUCD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is higher than the WELJ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XUCD.DE and WELJ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XUCD.DEWELJ.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

0.38

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.59

+0.08

Drawdowns

XUCD.DE vs. WELJ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XUCD.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.43%, which is greater than WELJ.DE's maximum drawdown of -28.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUCD.DE and WELJ.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XUCD.DEWELJ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.43%

-28.28%

-10.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.88%

-14.62%

+0.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.82%

-28.28%

-2.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.43%

-10.41%

+0.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.09%

-6.81%

-3.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.09%

5.36%

-0.27%

Volatility

XUCD.DE vs. WELJ.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1D (XUCD.DE) and Amundi S&P Global Consumer Discretionary ESG UCITS ETF EUR Acc (WELJ.DE) have volatilities of 5.29% and 5.07%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XUCD.DEWELJ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.29%

5.07%

+0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.18%

12.51%

+0.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.94%

16.84%

+1.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.03%

18.18%

+3.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.90%

18.18%

+3.72%

XUCD.DE vs. WELJ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XUCD.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than WELJ.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XUCD.DE vs. WELJ.DE - Dividend Comparison

XUCD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, while WELJ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
WELJ.DE
Amundi S&P Global Consumer Discretionary ESG UCITS ETF EUR Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XUCD.DE
Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1D
0.45%0.46%0.40%0.90%0.91%0.35%0.59%0.81%0.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, XUCD.DE and WELJ.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, XUCD.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XUCD.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for WELJ.DE.

XUCD.DE tracks MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary 20/35 Custom, while WELJ.DE tracks S&P Developed Ex-Korea LargeMidCap Sustainability Enhanced Consumer Discretionary. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XUCD.DE and 0.18% for WELJ.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XUCD.DE and WELJ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer