XUCD.DE vs. CEMG.DE
XUCD.DE (Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1D) and CEMG.DE (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Consumer Growth UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Consumer Staples Equities funds - XUCD.DE tracks the MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary 20/35 Custom while CEMG.DE tracks the Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XUCD.DE returned 8.69%/yr vs -2.27%/yr for CEMG.DE. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XUCD.DE charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for CEMG.DE.
Performance
XUCD.DE vs. CEMG.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XUCD.DE achieves a 0.22% return, which is significantly higher than CEMG.DE's -7.03% return.
XUCD.DE
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -0.63%
- YTD
- 0.22%
- 6M
- 0.35%
- 1Y
- 10.06%
- 3Y*
- 14.31%
- 5Y*
- 8.69%
- 10Y*
- —
CEMG.DE
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -1.58%
- YTD
- -7.03%
- 6M
- -8.66%
- 1Y
- -8.22%
- 3Y*
- 3.00%
- 5Y*
- -2.27%
- 10Y*
- 3.56%
XUCD.DE vs. CEMG.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XUCD.DE Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1D | 0.22% | -5.02% | 38.90% | 39.32% | -34.77% | 32.20% | 37.39% | 32.43% | 4.13% | 10.10% |
CEMG.DE iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Consumer Growth UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -7.03% | 0.86% | 16.93% | 1.69% | -16.08% | -1.07% | 11.30% | 25.51% | -16.68% | 5.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between XUCD.DE and CEMG.DE is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2017 | 0.63 |
The correlation between XUCD.DE and CEMG.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XUCD.DE vs. CEMG.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XUCD.DE
CEMG.DE
XUCD.DE vs. CEMG.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1D (XUCD.DE) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Consumer Growth UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CEMG.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XUCD.DE | CEMG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 0.91 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.73 | -0.58 | +1.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.00 | -1.23 | +3.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XUCD.DE | CEMG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 | -0.64 | +1.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | -0.12 | +0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.19 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.22 | +0.45 |
Drawdowns
XUCD.DE vs. CEMG.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XUCD.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.43%, which is greater than CEMG.DE's maximum drawdown of -33.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUCD.DE and CEMG.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XUCD.DE | CEMG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.43% | -33.94% | -4.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.88% | -14.05% | +0.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.82% | -20.18% | -10.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.43% | -31.08% | -7.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.94% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.43% | -18.75% | +9.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.09% | -12.26% | +2.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.09% | 6.68% | -1.59% |
Volatility
XUCD.DE vs. CEMG.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1D (XUCD.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.29% compared to iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Consumer Growth UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CEMG.DE) at 4.37%. This indicates that XUCD.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CEMG.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XUCD.DE | CEMG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.29% | 4.37% | +0.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.18% | 10.24% | +2.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.94% | 12.88% | +5.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.03% | 18.54% | +3.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.90% | 18.33% | +3.57% |
XUCD.DE vs. CEMG.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XUCD.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than CEMG.DE's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
XUCD.DE vs. CEMG.DE - Dividend Comparison
XUCD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, while CEMG.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEMG.DE iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Consumer Growth UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XUCD.DE Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1D | 0.45% | 0.46% | 0.40% | 0.90% | 0.91% | 0.35% | 0.59% | 0.81% | 0.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XUCD.DE and CEMG.DE have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XUCD.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XUCD.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for CEMG.DE.
XUCD.DE tracks MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary 20/35 Custom, while CEMG.DE tracks Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XUCD.DE and 0.60% for CEMG.DE.
Find the right allocation for XUCD.DE and CEMG.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer