PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XTWY vs. BLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XTWY vs. BLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BondBloxx Bloomberg Twenty Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XTWY) and Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF (BLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XTWY having a 0.98% return and BLV slightly higher at 1.00%.


XTWY

1D
0.11%
1M
2.79%
YTD
0.98%
6M
0.48%
1Y
3.85%
3Y*
-3.26%
5Y*
10Y*

BLV

1D
0.19%
1M
1.80%
YTD
1.00%
6M
0.87%
1Y
5.39%
3Y*
1.92%
5Y*
-3.65%
10Y*
0.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XTWY vs. BLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XTWY
BondBloxx Bloomberg Twenty Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF
0.98%2.52%-10.25%2.73%-7.81%
BLV
Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF
1.00%6.44%-3.65%7.35%-3.94%

Correlation

The correlation between XTWY and BLV is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2022

0.96

The correlation between XTWY and BLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XTWY vs. BLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XTWY
XTWY Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
XTWY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XTWY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
XTWY Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
XTWY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
XTWY Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

BLV
BLV Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
BLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLV Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
BLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLV Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XTWY vs. BLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx Bloomberg Twenty Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XTWY) and Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF (BLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XTWYBLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.12

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.41

0.95

-0.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.94

2.31

-1.36

XTWY vs. BLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XTWY Sharpe Ratio is 0.34, which is lower than the BLV Sharpe Ratio of 0.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XTWY and BLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XTWY vs. BLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XTWY drawdown since its inception was -25.92%, smaller than the maximum BLV drawdown of -38.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTWY and BLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XTWYBLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.92%

-38.29%

+12.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.48%

-5.73%

-3.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.16%

-15.16%

-7.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.11%

-23.60%

+9.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.25%

-9.55%

-2.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.09%

2.34%

+1.75%

Volatility

XTWY vs. BLV - Volatility Comparison

BondBloxx Bloomberg Twenty Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XTWY) has a higher volatility of 2.69% compared to Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF (BLV) at 1.96%. This indicates that XTWY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XTWYBLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.69%

1.96%

+0.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.87%

5.75%

+2.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.38%

7.97%

+3.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.54%

12.93%

+4.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.54%

11.99%

+5.55%

XTWY vs. BLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

XTWY has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is higher than BLV's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XTWY vs. BLV - Dividend Comparison

XTWY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.63%, less than BLV's 4.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BLV
Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF
4.77%4.67%5.09%4.06%4.17%3.37%6.12%3.57%4.07%3.63%4.16%4.37%
XTWY
BondBloxx Bloomberg Twenty Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF
4.63%4.56%4.65%3.86%1.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, XTWY and BLV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

XTWY has higher volatility (2.69%) compared to BLV (1.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XTWY dropped -25.92% vs BLV's -38.29%.

On 3-year performance, BLV leads with 1.92% vs -3.26% for XTWY. On fees, BLV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, BLV has been the lower-risk option at 1.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, BLV has performed better with a 1.92% return vs -3.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BLV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for XTWY.

BLV has the higher dividend yield at 4.77%, compared with 4.63% for XTWY.

XTWY is categorized as Government Bonds, while BLV is Long-Term Bond. XTWY tracks Bloomberg US Treasury 20 Year Target Duration Index, while BLV tracks Bloomberg U.S. Long Government/Credit Float Adjusted Index. They also come from different issuers: BondBloxx and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XTWY and 0.03% for BLV.

BLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.68 vs 0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XTWY and BLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer