PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XTRE vs. GOVZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XTRE vs. GOVZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BondBloxx Bloomberg Three Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XTRE) and iShares 25+ Year Treasury STRIPS Bond ETF (GOVZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XTRE achieves a 0.15% return, which is significantly lower than GOVZ's 3.57% return.


XTRE

1D
0.24%
1M
0.42%
YTD
0.15%
6M
0.25%
1Y
2.70%
3Y*
4.09%
5Y*
10Y*

GOVZ

1D
2.29%
1M
6.77%
YTD
3.57%
6M
1.48%
1Y
4.27%
3Y*
-6.85%
5Y*
-11.18%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XTRE vs. GOVZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XTRE
BondBloxx Bloomberg Three Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF
0.15%6.05%3.05%4.44%-0.00%
GOVZ
iShares 25+ Year Treasury STRIPS Bond ETF
3.57%-1.81%-16.24%0.90%-10.92%

Correlation

The correlation between XTRE and GOVZ is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2022

0.65

The correlation between XTRE and GOVZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XTRE vs. GOVZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XTRE
XTRE Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
XTRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XTRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
XTRE Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
XTRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
XTRE Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

GOVZ
GOVZ Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
GOVZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOVZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOVZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
GOVZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOVZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XTRE vs. GOVZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx Bloomberg Three Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XTRE) and iShares 25+ Year Treasury STRIPS Bond ETF (GOVZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XTREGOVZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.06

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.78

0.30

+1.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.64

0.66

+3.99

XTRE vs. GOVZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XTRE Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is higher than the GOVZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XTRE and GOVZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XTRE vs. GOVZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XTRE drawdown since its inception was -2.89%, smaller than the maximum GOVZ drawdown of -59.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTRE and GOVZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XTREGOVZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.89%

-59.65%

+56.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.53%

-14.16%

+12.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.00%

-28.72%

+26.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.93%

-54.49%

+53.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.83%

-40.04%

+39.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.58%

6.51%

-5.93%

Volatility

XTRE vs. GOVZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BondBloxx Bloomberg Three Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XTRE) is 0.76%, while iShares 25+ Year Treasury STRIPS Bond ETF (GOVZ) has a volatility of 4.06%. This indicates that XTRE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOVZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XTREGOVZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.76%

4.06%

-3.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.60%

10.91%

-9.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.16%

15.89%

-13.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.31%

23.88%

-20.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.31%

23.29%

-19.98%

XTRE vs. GOVZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

XTRE has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than GOVZ's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XTRE vs. GOVZ - Dividend Comparison

XTRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.00%, less than GOVZ's 4.95% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
GOVZ
iShares 25+ Year Treasury STRIPS Bond ETF
4.95%5.00%4.68%3.84%3.69%1.76%0.39%
XTRE
BondBloxx Bloomberg Three Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF
4.00%3.85%4.19%3.97%1.16%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XTRE and GOVZ have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GOVZ has higher volatility (4.06%) compared to XTRE (0.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XTRE dropped -2.89% vs GOVZ's -59.65%.

On 3-year performance, XTRE leads with 4.09% vs -6.85% for GOVZ. On fees, XTRE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, XTRE has been the lower-risk option at 0.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, XTRE has performed better with a 4.09% return vs -6.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XTRE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for GOVZ.

GOVZ has the higher dividend yield at 4.95%, compared with 4.00% for XTRE.

XTRE tracks Bloomberg US Treasury 3 Year Target Duration Index, while GOVZ tracks ICE BofA Long US Treasury Principal STRIPS Index. They also come from different issuers: BondBloxx and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for XTRE and 0.15% for GOVZ.

XTRE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.26 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XTRE and GOVZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer