PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XTRE vs. FAAR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XTRE vs. FAAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BondBloxx Bloomberg Three Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XTRE) and First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XTRE achieves a -0.02% return, which is significantly lower than FAAR's 20.28% return.


XTRE

1D
0.18%
1M
0.20%
YTD
-0.02%
6M
0.05%
1Y
2.88%
3Y*
4.05%
5Y*
10Y*

FAAR

1D
0.31%
1M
-4.57%
YTD
20.28%
6M
20.86%
1Y
26.92%
3Y*
10.85%
5Y*
8.03%
10Y*
4.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XTRE vs. FAAR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XTRE
BondBloxx Bloomberg Three Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF
-0.02%6.05%3.05%4.44%-0.00%
FAAR
First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF
20.28%8.07%5.97%-5.63%-1.42%

Correlation

The correlation between XTRE and FAAR is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2022

-0.10

The correlation between XTRE and FAAR shifts across timeframes, from -0.22 (1 year) to -0.10 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XTRE vs. FAAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XTRE
XTRE Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
XTRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XTRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
XTRE Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
XTRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
XTRE Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

FAAR
FAAR Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FAAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAAR Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
FAAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAAR Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XTRE vs. FAAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx Bloomberg Three Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XTRE) and First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XTREFAARDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.34

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.95

4.72

-2.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.21

14.40

-9.19

XTRE vs. FAAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XTRE Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is lower than the FAAR Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XTRE and FAAR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XTRE vs. FAAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XTRE drawdown since its inception was -2.89%, smaller than the maximum FAAR drawdown of -18.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTRE and FAAR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XTREFAARDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.89%

-18.03%

+15.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.53%

-5.68%

+4.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.00%

-11.54%

+9.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.09%

-5.39%

+4.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.83%

-7.83%

+7.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.57%

1.87%

-1.30%

Volatility

XTRE vs. FAAR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BondBloxx Bloomberg Three Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XTRE) is 0.73%, while First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR) has a volatility of 2.50%. This indicates that XTRE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FAAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XTREFAARDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.73%

2.50%

-1.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.58%

9.71%

-8.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15%

13.36%

-11.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.31%

12.95%

-9.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.31%

11.53%

-8.22%

XTRE vs. FAAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

XTRE has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than FAAR's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

XTRE vs. FAAR - Dividend Comparison

XTRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.00%, less than FAAR's 9.57% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FAAR
First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF
9.57%11.63%3.45%3.20%5.82%6.49%3.05%1.02%0.58%2.83%
XTRE
BondBloxx Bloomberg Three Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF
4.00%3.85%4.19%3.97%1.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XTRE and FAAR have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FAAR has higher volatility (2.50%) compared to XTRE (0.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XTRE dropped -2.89% vs FAAR's -18.03%.

On 3-year performance, FAAR leads with 10.85% vs 4.05% for XTRE. On fees, XTRE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, XTRE has been the lower-risk option at 0.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, FAAR has performed better with a 10.85% return vs 4.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XTRE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FAAR.

FAAR has the higher dividend yield at 9.57%, compared with 4.00% for XTRE.

XTRE is categorized as Government Bonds, while FAAR is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: BondBloxx and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for XTRE and 0.95% for FAAR.

FAAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XTRE and FAAR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer