XTR vs. APRT

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

XTR (Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF) and APRT (AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Apr ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XTR is a Equity Hedged fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Tail Risk Index, while APRT is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Allianz. XTR is passively managed, while APRT is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, XTR returned 16.87%/yr vs 13.68%/yr for APRT. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XTR charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for APRT.

Performance

XTR vs. APRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF (XTR) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Apr ETF (APRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XTR achieves a 5.85% return, which is significantly lower than APRT's 9.22% return.

XTR

• 1D: -0.42%
• 1M: -1.44%
• YTD: 5.85%
• 6M: 4.51%
• 1Y: 17.69%
• 3Y*: 16.87%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

APRT

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: -0.12%
• YTD: 9.22%
• 6M: 9.26%
• 1Y: 16.82%
• 3Y*: 13.68%
• 5Y*: 10.31%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XTR vs. APRT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
XTR Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF	5.85%	13.66%	21.85%	21.16%	-17.67%	4.25%
APRT AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Apr ETF	9.22%	7.99%	15.15%	22.13%	-6.41%	2.83%

Correlation

The correlation between XTR and APRT is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 26, 2021	0.95

The correlation between XTR and APRT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

XTR vs. APRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XTR

XTR Risk / Return Rank: 50
XTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
XTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
XTR Omega Ratio Rank: 48
XTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
XTR Martin Ratio Rank: 55

APRT

APRT Risk / Return Rank: 97
APRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
APRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
APRT Omega Ratio Rank: 97
APRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
APRT Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XTR vs. APRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF (XTR) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Apr ETF (APRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XTR	APRT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.56	3.32	-1.75
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.18	5.64	-3.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.81	-0.54
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.09	10.62	-8.53
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.57	50.57	-42.00

XTR vs. APRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XTR Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is lower than the APRT Sharpe Ratio of 3.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XTR and APRT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XTR vs. APRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XTR drawdown since its inception was -20.83%, which is greater than APRT's maximum drawdown of -14.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTR and APRT.

Drawdown Indicators

	XTR	APRT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.83%	-14.98%	-5.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.51%	-1.59%	-6.92%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.35%	-14.98%	+0.63%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-14.98%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.22%	-0.81%	-2.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.90%	-2.04%	-3.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.07%	0.33%	+1.74%

Volatility

XTR vs. APRT - Volatility Comparison

Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF (XTR) has a higher volatility of 4.66% compared to AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Apr ETF (APRT) at 1.81%. This indicates that XTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XTR	APRT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.66%	1.81%	+2.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.02%	4.32%	+4.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.39%	5.12%	+6.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.85%	10.80%	+3.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.85%	10.27%	+3.58%

XTR vs. APRT - Expense Ratio Comparison

XTR has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than APRT's 0.74% expense ratio.

Dividends

XTR vs. APRT - Dividend Comparison

XTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.84%, while APRT has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
APRT AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Apr ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	4.67%
XTR Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF	16.84%	17.82%	20.89%	1.09%	1.08%	2.32%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XTR and APRT in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, XTR and APRT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, XTR or APRT?

XTR has higher volatility (4.66%) compared to APRT (1.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XTR dropped -20.83% vs APRT's -14.98%.

Which ETF is better, XTR or APRT?

On 3-year performance, XTR leads with 16.87% vs 13.68% for APRT. On fees, XTR is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, APRT has been the lower-risk option at 1.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XTR or APRT?

Over the 3-year period, XTR has performed better with a 16.87% return vs 13.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XTR or APRT?

XTR is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for APRT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XTR or APRT?

XTR has the higher dividend yield at 16.84%, compared with 0.00% for APRT.

What is the main difference between XTR and APRT?

XTR is categorized as Equity Hedged, while APRT is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Allianz. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XTR and 0.74% for APRT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

APRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.32 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.