PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XTOC vs. XAPR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XTOC vs. XAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - October (XTOC) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April (XAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XTOC achieves a 7.31% return, which is significantly higher than XAPR's 3.39% return.


XTOC

1D
-0.20%
1M
2.52%
YTD
7.31%
6M
8.16%
1Y
18.28%
3Y*
14.71%
5Y*
10Y*

XAPR

1D
-0.16%
1M
1.66%
YTD
3.39%
6M
4.05%
1Y
8.79%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XTOC vs. XAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XTOC and XAPR is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2024

0.78

The correlation between XTOC and XAPR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XTOC vs. XAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XTOC
XTOC Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
XTOC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XTOC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
XTOC Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
XTOC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
XTOC Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

XAPR
XAPR Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
XAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
XAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
XAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
XAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XTOC vs. XAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - October (XTOC) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April (XAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XTOCXAPRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

2.06

-0.64

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

13.37

-10.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.28

70.60

-57.32

XTOC vs. XAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XTOC Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is lower than the XAPR Sharpe Ratio of 4.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XTOC and XAPR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XTOCXAPRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.00

4.31

-2.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

1.88

-1.30

Drawdowns

XTOC vs. XAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XTOC drawdown since its inception was -24.09%, which is greater than XAPR's maximum drawdown of -6.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTOC and XAPR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XTOCXAPRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.09%

-6.18%

-17.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.41%

-0.66%

-6.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.20%

-0.16%

-0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.87%

-0.18%

-4.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.38%

0.12%

+1.26%

Volatility

XTOC vs. XAPR - Volatility Comparison

Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - October (XTOC) has a higher volatility of 1.11% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April (XAPR) at 0.75%. This indicates that XTOC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XTOCXAPRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.11%

0.75%

+0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.51%

1.31%

+6.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.19%

2.05%

+7.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.16%

6.18%

+8.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.16%

6.18%

+8.98%

XTOC vs. XAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

XTOC has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than XAPR's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

XTOC vs. XAPR - Dividend Comparison

Neither XTOC nor XAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XTOC and XAPR have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XTOC has higher volatility (1.11%) compared to XAPR (0.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XTOC dropped -24.09% vs XAPR's -6.18%.

On 1-year performance, XTOC leads with 18.28% vs 8.79% for XAPR. On fees, XTOC is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, XAPR has been the lower-risk option at 0.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XTOC has performed better with a 18.28% return vs 8.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XTOC is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for XAPR.

XTOC and XAPR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for XTOC and 0.85% for XAPR.

XAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.31 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XTOC and XAPR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer