XTOC vs. APRT

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

XTOC (Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - October) and APRT (AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Apr ETF) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, XTOC returned 14.24%/yr vs 13.70%/yr for APRT. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XTOC charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for APRT.

Performance

XTOC vs. APRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - October (XTOC) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Apr ETF (APRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XTOC achieves a 7.04% return, which is significantly lower than APRT's 9.26% return.

XTOC

• 1D: -0.51%
• 1M: 0.43%
• YTD: 7.04%
• 6M: 6.54%
• 1Y: 16.62%
• 3Y*: 14.24%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

APRT

• 1D: -0.51%
• 1M: -0.08%
• YTD: 9.26%
• 6M: 9.39%
• 1Y: 17.60%
• 3Y*: 13.70%
• 5Y*: 10.35%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XTOC vs. APRT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
XTOC Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - October	7.04%	13.87%	10.47%	25.42%	-17.85%	6.65%
APRT AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Apr ETF	9.26%	7.99%	15.15%	22.13%	-6.41%	4.45%

Correlation

The correlation between XTOC and APRT is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2021	0.90

The correlation between XTOC and APRT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

XTOC vs. APRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XTOC

XTOC Risk / Return Rank: 63
XTOC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
XTOC Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
XTOC Omega Ratio Rank: 72
XTOC Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
XTOC Martin Ratio Rank: 72

APRT

APRT Risk / Return Rank: 97
APRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
APRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
APRT Omega Ratio Rank: 97
APRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
APRT Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XTOC vs. APRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - October (XTOC) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Apr ETF (APRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XTOC	APRT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.81	3.45	-1.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.60	5.88	-3.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.85	-0.47
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.25	11.11	-8.86
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.01	53.57	-41.56

XTOC vs. APRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XTOC Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is lower than the APRT Sharpe Ratio of 3.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XTOC and APRT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XTOC vs. APRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XTOC drawdown since its inception was -24.09%, which is greater than APRT's maximum drawdown of -14.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTOC and APRT.

Drawdown Indicators

	XTOC	APRT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.09%	-14.98%	-9.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.41%	-1.59%	-5.82%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.02%	-14.98%	-3.04%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-14.98%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.69%	-0.77%	+0.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.82%	-2.04%	-2.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.39%	0.33%	+1.06%

Volatility

XTOC vs. APRT - Volatility Comparison

Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - October (XTOC) has a higher volatility of 2.15% compared to AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Apr ETF (APRT) at 1.81%. This indicates that XTOC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XTOC	APRT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.15%	1.81%	+0.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.65%	4.33%	+3.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.25%	5.14%	+4.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.10%	10.80%	+4.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.10%	10.27%	+4.83%

XTOC vs. APRT - Expense Ratio Comparison

XTOC has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than APRT's 0.74% expense ratio.

Dividends

XTOC vs. APRT - Dividend Comparison

Neither XTOC nor APRT has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
APRT AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Apr ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	4.67%
XTOC Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - October	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XTOC and APRT in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, XTOC and APRT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, XTOC or APRT?

XTOC has higher volatility (2.15%) compared to APRT (1.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XTOC dropped -24.09% vs APRT's -14.98%.

Which ETF is better, XTOC or APRT?

On 3-year performance, XTOC leads with 14.24% vs 13.70% for APRT. On fees, APRT is cheaper at 0.74% per year. On volatility, APRT has been the lower-risk option at 1.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XTOC or APRT?

Over the 3-year period, XTOC has performed better with a 14.24% return vs 13.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XTOC or APRT?

APRT is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for XTOC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XTOC or APRT?

XTOC and APRT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between XTOC and APRT?

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Allianz. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for XTOC and 0.74% for APRT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

APRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.45 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.