XTLH.TO vs. XGRO.TO
XTLH.TO (iShares 20+ Year U.S. Treasury Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)) and XGRO.TO (iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio) are both exchange-traded funds - XTLH.TO is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index (CAD-Hedged), while XGRO.TO is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by iShares. XTLH.TO is passively managed, while XGRO.TO is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, XTLH.TO returned -3.65%/yr vs 17.87%/yr for XGRO.TO. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XTLH.TO charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XGRO.TO.
Performance
XTLH.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XTLH.TO achieves a -1.03% return, which is significantly lower than XGRO.TO's 10.38% return.
XTLH.TO
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- 0.65%
- YTD
- -1.03%
- 6M
- -2.78%
- 1Y
- 3.13%
- 3Y*
- -3.65%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XGRO.TO
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 5.42%
- YTD
- 10.38%
- 6M
- 8.74%
- 1Y
- 23.44%
- 3Y*
- 17.87%
- 5Y*
- 10.83%
- 10Y*
- 10.20%
XTLH.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XTLH.TO iShares 20+ Year U.S. Treasury Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | -1.03% | 2.61% | -9.55% | 1.56% |
XGRO.TO iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio | 10.38% | 15.59% | 19.53% | 10.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between XTLH.TO and XGRO.TO is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2023 | 0.24 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XTLH.TO vs. XGRO.TO — Risk / Return Rank
XTLH.TO
XGRO.TO
XTLH.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 20+ Year U.S. Treasury Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XTLH.TO) and iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio (XGRO.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XTLH.TO | XGRO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.41 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.38 | 3.30 | -2.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.94 | 14.67 | -13.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XTLH.TO | XGRO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 | 2.18 | -1.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.99 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.84 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.15 | 0.35 | -0.51 |
Drawdowns
XTLH.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XTLH.TO drawdown since its inception was -22.72%, smaller than the maximum XGRO.TO drawdown of -47.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTLH.TO and XGRO.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XTLH.TO | XGRO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.72% | -47.97% | +25.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.37% | -7.12% | -1.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.47% | -12.47% | -7.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.80% | -0.18% | -14.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.15% | -8.49% | -3.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.36% | 1.60% | +1.76% |
Volatility
XTLH.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares 20+ Year U.S. Treasury Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XTLH.TO) is 2.98%, while iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio (XGRO.TO) has a volatility of 3.43%. This indicates that XTLH.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XGRO.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XTLH.TO | XGRO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.98% | 3.43% | -0.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.42% | 9.19% | -2.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.72% | 10.78% | -1.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.16% | 11.05% | +3.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.16% | 12.26% | +1.90% |
XTLH.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XTLH.TO has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than XGRO.TO's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XTLH.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Dividend Comparison
XTLH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.62%, more than XGRO.TO's 1.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XGRO.TO iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio | 1.76% | 1.92% | 1.98% | 2.22% | 1.86% | 1.66% | 1.94% | 2.21% | 7.42% | 2.04% | 2.65% | 2.15% |
XTLH.TO iShares 20+ Year U.S. Treasury Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | 4.62% | 4.42% | 4.32% | 2.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XTLH.TO and XGRO.TO have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XTLH.TO is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XTLH.TO is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XGRO.TO.
XTLH.TO is categorized as Government Bonds, while XGRO.TO is Diversified Portfolio. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for XTLH.TO and 0.20% for XGRO.TO.
Find the right allocation for XTLH.TO and XGRO.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer