PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XTLH.TO vs. HPYM.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XTLH.TO vs. HPYM.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares 20+ Year U.S. Treasury Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XTLH.TO) and Harvest Premium Yield 7-10 Year Treasury ETF - Class A Units (HPYM.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XTLH.TO achieves a -1.03% return, which is significantly higher than HPYM.TO's -1.25% return.


XTLH.TO

1D
-0.42%
1M
0.65%
YTD
-1.03%
6M
-2.78%
1Y
3.13%
3Y*
-3.65%
5Y*
10Y*

HPYM.TO

1D
-0.20%
1M
-0.10%
YTD
-1.25%
6M
-1.71%
1Y
2.79%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XTLH.TO vs. HPYM.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XTLH.TO and HPYM.TO is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 18, 2024

0.82

The correlation between XTLH.TO and HPYM.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XTLH.TO vs. HPYM.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XTLH.TO
XTLH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
XTLH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XTLH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
XTLH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
XTLH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
XTLH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

HPYM.TO
HPYM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
HPYM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HPYM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
HPYM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
HPYM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
HPYM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XTLH.TO vs. HPYM.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 20+ Year U.S. Treasury Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XTLH.TO) and Harvest Premium Yield 7-10 Year Treasury ETF - Class A Units (HPYM.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XTLH.TOHPYM.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.11

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.38

0.73

-0.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.94

2.05

-1.11

XTLH.TO vs. HPYM.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XTLH.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.32, which is lower than the HPYM.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XTLH.TO and HPYM.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XTLH.TOHPYM.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

0.62

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.15

0.37

-0.52

Drawdowns

XTLH.TO vs. HPYM.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XTLH.TO drawdown since its inception was -22.72%, which is greater than HPYM.TO's maximum drawdown of -6.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTLH.TO and HPYM.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XTLH.TOHPYM.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.72%

-6.19%

-16.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.37%

-3.85%

-4.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.80%

-2.71%

-12.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.15%

-1.94%

-10.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.36%

1.36%

+2.00%

Volatility

XTLH.TO vs. HPYM.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares 20+ Year U.S. Treasury Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XTLH.TO) has a higher volatility of 2.98% compared to Harvest Premium Yield 7-10 Year Treasury ETF - Class A Units (HPYM.TO) at 2.02%. This indicates that XTLH.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HPYM.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XTLH.TOHPYM.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.98%

2.02%

+0.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.42%

3.28%

+3.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.72%

4.53%

+5.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.16%

5.61%

+8.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.16%

5.61%

+8.55%

XTLH.TO vs. HPYM.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XTLH.TO has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than HPYM.TO's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

XTLH.TO vs. HPYM.TO - Dividend Comparison

XTLH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.62%, less than HPYM.TO's 9.38% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


XTLH.TO and HPYM.TO have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XTLH.TO is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XTLH.TO is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for HPYM.TO.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Harvest. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for XTLH.TO and 0.45% for HPYM.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XTLH.TO and HPYM.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer