PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XTJL vs. SMDD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XTJL vs. SMDD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL) and ProShares UltraPro Short MidCap400 (SMDD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XTJL achieves a 6.32% return, which is significantly higher than SMDD's -34.07% return.


XTJL

1D
0.76%
1M
0.96%
6M
5.49%
YTD
6.32%
1Y
14.27%
3Y*
13.98%
5Y*
9.55%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.76%

SMDD

1D
0.12%
1M
3.72%
6M
-26.03%
YTD
-34.07%
1Y
-46.01%
3Y*
-33.04%
5Y*
-29.66%
10Y*
-39.58%
ALL TIME*
-42.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$53.27K$77.83K$71.85K
$26.11K$26.81K$267.40K

XTJL vs. SMDD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
XTJL
Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July
6.32%15.42%14.43%25.72%-15.66%7.81%
SMDD
ProShares UltraPro Short MidCap400
-34.07%-27.46%-31.02%-38.37%7.69%-23.34%

Correlation

The correlation between XTJL and SMDD is -0.71, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

-0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2021

-0.80

The correlation between XTJL and SMDD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.80 to -0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XTJL vs. SMDD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XTJL
XTJL Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
XTJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XTJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
XTJL Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
XTJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
XTJL Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

SMDD
SMDD Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
SMDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMDD Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
SMDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMDD Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XTJL vs. SMDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL) and ProShares UltraPro Short MidCap400 (SMDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XTJLSMDDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

0.85

+0.51

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.55

-0.87

+3.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.07

-1.44

+15.50

XTJL vs. SMDD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XTJL Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is higher than the SMDD Sharpe Ratio of -0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XTJL and SMDD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XTJL vs. SMDD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XTJL drawdown since its inception was -23.24%, smaller than the maximum SMDD drawdown of -99.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTJL and SMDD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XTJLSMDDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.24%

-99.99%

+76.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.12%

-50.01%

+44.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.70%

-82.62%

+65.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.24%

-88.24%

+65.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.09%

-99.99%

+99.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.92%

-93.01%

+89.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.93%

30.36%

-29.43%

Volatility

XTJL vs. SMDD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL) is 2.90%, while ProShares UltraPro Short MidCap400 (SMDD) has a volatility of 9.96%. This indicates that XTJL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMDD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XTJLSMDDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.90%

9.96%

-7.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.12%

35.01%

-28.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.79%

47.21%

-39.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.11%

58.59%

-43.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.03%

63.23%

-48.20%

XTJL vs. SMDD - Expense Ratio Comparison

XTJL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than SMDD's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

XTJL vs. SMDD - Dividend Comparison

XTJL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.67%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
SMDD
ProShares UltraPro Short MidCap400
5.67%4.96%4.09%3.86%0.14%0.00%0.13%1.51%0.09%
XTJL
Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XTJL and SMDD have a correlation of -0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMDD has higher volatility (9.96%) compared to XTJL (2.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XTJL dropped -23.24% vs SMDD's -99.99%.

On 5-year performance, XTJL leads with 9.55% vs -29.66% for SMDD. On fees, XTJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, XTJL has been the lower-risk option at 2.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, XTJL has performed better with a 9.55% return vs -29.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XTJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SMDD.

SMDD has the higher dividend yield at 5.67%, compared with 0.00% for XTJL.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for XTJL and 0.95% for SMDD.

XTJL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs -0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XTJL and SMDD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer