XTJL vs. MVLL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XTJL (Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July) and MVLL (GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. XTJL is actively managed, while MVLL is passively managed. Over the past year, XTJL returned 15.64% vs 1215.17% for MVLL. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XTJL charges 0.79%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for MVLL.

Performance

XTJL vs. MVLL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL) and GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF (MVLL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XTJL achieves a 5.36% return, which is significantly lower than MVLL's 842.68% return.

XTJL

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 1.16%
• YTD: 5.36%
• 6M: 6.38%
• 1Y: 15.64%
• 3Y*: 14.68%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MVLL

• 1D: 7.14%
• 1M: 201.84%
• YTD: 842.68%
• 6M: 558.01%
• 1Y: 1,215.17%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XTJL vs. MVLL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
XTJL Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July	5.36%	15.51%
MVLL GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF	842.68%	-10.19%

Correlation

The correlation between XTJL and MVLL is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2025	0.49

XTJL vs. MVLL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XTJL	MVLL
Technology	36.2%	66.6%
Financial Services	11.9%	-
Communication Services	10.9%	-
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	-
Healthcare	8.4%	-
Industrials	8.1%	-
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	-
Energy	3.5%	-
Utilities	2.3%	-
Real Estate	1.9%	-
Basic Materials	1.8%	-

Return for Risk

XTJL vs. MVLL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XTJL

XTJL Risk / Return Rank: 71
XTJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
XTJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
XTJL Omega Ratio Rank: 77
XTJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
XTJL Martin Ratio Rank: 84

MVLL

MVLL Risk / Return Rank: 96
MVLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
MVLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
MVLL Omega Ratio Rank: 92
MVLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
MVLL Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XTJL vs. MVLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL) and GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF (MVLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XTJL	MVLL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.12	9.23	-7.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.14	4.79	-1.65
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.63	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.07	25.11	-22.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.37	52.27	-34.90
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XTJL vs. MVLL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XTJL Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is lower than the MVLL Sharpe Ratio of 9.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XTJL and MVLL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XTJL	MVLL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.12	9.23	-7.11
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.65	3.33	-2.69

Drawdowns

XTJL vs. MVLL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XTJL drawdown since its inception was -23.24%, smaller than the maximum MVLL drawdown of -59.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTJL and MVLL.

Drawdown Indicators

	XTJL	MVLL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.24%	-59.02%	+35.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.12%	-48.93%	+43.81%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.70%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.04%	-22.42%	+18.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.90%	23.46%	-22.56%

Volatility

XTJL vs. MVLL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL) is 0.33%, while GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF (MVLL) has a volatility of 60.78%. This indicates that XTJL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MVLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XTJL	MVLL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.33%	60.78%	-60.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.72%	96.08%	-90.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.43%	133.11%	-125.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.22%	139.63%	-124.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.22%	139.63%	-124.41%

XTJL vs. MVLL - Expense Ratio Comparison

XTJL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than MVLL's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

XTJL vs. MVLL - Dividend Comparison

Neither XTJL nor MVLL has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XTJL and MVLL in my portfolio?

XTJL and MVLL have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XTJL or MVLL?

MVLL has higher volatility (60.78%) compared to XTJL (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XTJL dropped -23.24% vs MVLL's -59.02%.

Which ETF is better, XTJL or MVLL?

On 1-year performance, MVLL leads with 1215.17% vs 15.64% for XTJL. On fees, XTJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, XTJL has been the lower-risk option at 0.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XTJL or MVLL?

Over the 1-year period, MVLL has performed better with a 1215.17% return vs 15.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XTJL or MVLL?

XTJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MVLL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XTJL or MVLL?

XTJL and MVLL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between XTJL and MVLL?

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for XTJL and 1.50% for MVLL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MVLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (9.23 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.