PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XTEN vs. MGOV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XTEN vs. MGOV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BondBloxx Bloomberg Ten Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XTEN) and First Trust Intermediate Government Opportunities ETF (MGOV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XTEN achieves a -0.54% return, which is significantly lower than MGOV's 0.19% return.


XTEN

1D
-0.35%
1M
0.25%
YTD
-0.54%
6M
-1.22%
1Y
4.81%
3Y*
1.73%
5Y*
10Y*

MGOV

1D
-0.20%
1M
-0.19%
YTD
0.19%
6M
-0.01%
1Y
6.73%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XTEN vs. MGOV - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XTEN and MGOV is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2023

0.91

The correlation between XTEN and MGOV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XTEN vs. MGOV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XTEN
XTEN Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
XTEN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XTEN Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
XTEN Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
XTEN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
XTEN Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

MGOV
MGOV Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
MGOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGOV Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
MGOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGOV Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XTEN vs. MGOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx Bloomberg Ten Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XTEN) and First Trust Intermediate Government Opportunities ETF (MGOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XTENMGOVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.26

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.89

1.92

-1.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.59

5.87

-3.27

XTEN vs. MGOV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XTEN Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is lower than the MGOV Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XTEN and MGOV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XTENMGOVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

1.46

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

0.88

-0.73

Drawdowns

XTEN vs. MGOV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XTEN drawdown since its inception was -13.86%, which is greater than MGOV's maximum drawdown of -6.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTEN and MGOV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XTENMGOVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.86%

-6.11%

-7.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.42%

-3.53%

-1.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.51%

-2.38%

-1.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.03%

-1.62%

-2.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.86%

1.15%

+0.71%

Volatility

XTEN vs. MGOV - Volatility Comparison

BondBloxx Bloomberg Ten Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XTEN) has a higher volatility of 2.05% compared to First Trust Intermediate Government Opportunities ETF (MGOV) at 1.70%. This indicates that XTEN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MGOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XTENMGOVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.05%

1.70%

+0.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.41%

3.22%

+1.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.41%

4.64%

+1.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.56%

5.95%

+3.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.56%

5.95%

+3.61%

XTEN vs. MGOV - Expense Ratio Comparison

XTEN has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than MGOV's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

XTEN vs. MGOV - Dividend Comparison

XTEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.40%, less than MGOV's 4.98% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
MGOV
First Trust Intermediate Government Opportunities ETF
4.98%4.95%5.05%1.47%0.00%
XTEN
BondBloxx Bloomberg Ten Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF
4.40%4.05%4.21%3.71%1.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


XTEN and MGOV have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XTEN has higher volatility (2.05%) compared to MGOV (1.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XTEN dropped -13.86% vs MGOV's -6.11%.

On 1-year performance, MGOV leads with 6.73% vs 4.81% for XTEN. On fees, XTEN is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, MGOV has been the lower-risk option at 1.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MGOV has performed better with a 6.73% return vs 4.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XTEN is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for MGOV.

MGOV has the higher dividend yield at 4.98%, compared with 4.40% for XTEN.

They also come from different issuers: BondBloxx and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for XTEN and 0.65% for MGOV.

MGOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XTEN and MGOV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer