XTEN vs. IBTE

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XTEN (BondBloxx Bloomberg Ten Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF) and IBTE (iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Treasury ETF) are both Government Bonds funds - XTEN tracks the Bloomberg US Treasury 10 Year Target Duration Index while IBTE tracks the ICE 2024 Maturity US Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. XTEN charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for IBTE.

Performance

XTEN vs. IBTE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BondBloxx Bloomberg Ten Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XTEN) and iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Treasury ETF (IBTE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

XTEN

• 1D: -0.35%
• 1M: 0.25%
• YTD: -0.54%
• 6M: -1.22%
• 1Y: 4.81%
• 3Y*: 1.73%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IBTE

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XTEN vs. IBTE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
XTEN BondBloxx Bloomberg Ten Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF	-1.00%
IBTE iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Treasury ETF	0.00%

Return for Risk

XTEN vs. IBTE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XTEN

XTEN Risk / Return Rank: 21
XTEN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
XTEN Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
XTEN Omega Ratio Rank: 20
XTEN Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
XTEN Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XTEN vs. IBTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx Bloomberg Ten Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XTEN) and iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Treasury ETF (IBTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XTEN	IBTE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.75	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.13	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.89	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.59	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XTEN	IBTE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.15	—	—

Drawdowns

XTEN vs. IBTE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XTEN drawdown since its inception was -13.86%, which is greater than IBTE's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTEN and IBTE.

Drawdown Indicators

	XTEN	IBTE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.86%	0.00%	-13.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.42%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.15%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.51%	0.00%	-3.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.03%	0.00%	-4.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.86%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XTEN	IBTE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.05%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.41%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.41%	0.00%	+6.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.56%	0.00%	+9.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.56%	0.00%	+9.56%

XTEN vs. IBTE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XTEN has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than IBTE's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XTEN vs. IBTE - Dividend Comparison

XTEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.40%, while IBTE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
IBTE iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Treasury ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XTEN BondBloxx Bloomberg Ten Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF	4.40%	4.05%	4.21%	3.71%	1.04%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, XTEN or IBTE?

On fees, IBTE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XTEN or IBTE?

IBTE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for XTEN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XTEN or IBTE?

XTEN has the higher dividend yield at 4.40%, compared with 0.00% for IBTE.

What is the main difference between XTEN and IBTE?

XTEN tracks Bloomberg US Treasury 10 Year Target Duration Index, while IBTE tracks ICE 2024 Maturity US Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: BondBloxx and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for XTEN and 0.07% for IBTE.