XTAP vs. UNHW
XTAP (Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF) and UNHW (Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.10 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. XTAP charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for UNHW.
Performance
XTAP vs. UNHW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XTAP achieves a 12.91% return, which is significantly lower than UNHW's 28.89% return.
XTAP
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 1.42%
- 6M
- 12.17%
- YTD
- 12.91%
- 1Y
- 19.58%
- 3Y*
- 17.31%
- 5Y*
- 10.84%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.57%
UNHW
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -2.71%
- 6M
- 54.46%
- YTD
- 28.89%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $423.60K | $609.21K | $366.99K | |
| $37.97K | $25.72K | $30.55K |
XTAP vs. UNHW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XTAP Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF | 12.91% | 1.09% |
UNHW Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF | 28.89% | 1.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between XTAP and UNHW is 0.10, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2025 | 0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XTAP vs. UNHW — Risk / Return Rank
XTAP
UNHW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XTAP vs. UNHW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF (XTAP) and Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF (UNHW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XTAP | UNHW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.02 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 11.46 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 58.60 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XTAP vs. UNHW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XTAP drawdown since its inception was -22.13%, smaller than the maximum UNHW drawdown of -32.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTAP and UNHW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XTAP | UNHW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.13% | -32.28% | +10.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.72% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.83% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.13% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -5.84% | +5.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.36% | -9.80% | +6.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.33% | — | — |
Volatility
XTAP vs. UNHW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XTAP | UNHW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.63% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.03% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.89% | 46.31% | -41.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.53% | 46.31% | -31.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.23% | 46.31% | -32.08% |
XTAP vs. UNHW - Expense Ratio Comparison
XTAP has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than UNHW's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
XTAP vs. UNHW - Dividend Comparison
XTAP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UNHW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.57%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
UNHW Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF | 22.57% | 2.81% |
XTAP Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XTAP and UNHW have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XTAP is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XTAP is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for UNHW.
UNHW has the higher dividend yield at 22.57%, compared with 0.00% for XTAP.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for XTAP and 0.99% for UNHW.
Find the right allocation for XTAP and UNHW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer