XTAP vs. POCT
XTAP (Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF) and POCT (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October) are both exchange-traded funds - XTAP is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Innovator, while POCT is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect October Series Index. XTAP is actively managed, while POCT is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XTAP returned 11.17%/yr vs 9.82%/yr for POCT. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.
Performance
XTAP vs. POCT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XTAP achieves a 11.19% return, which is significantly higher than POCT's 5.33% return.
XTAP
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 2.06%
- YTD
- 11.19%
- 6M
- 12.40%
- 1Y
- 21.81%
- 3Y*
- 17.98%
- 5Y*
- 11.17%
- 10Y*
- —
POCT
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 2.01%
- YTD
- 5.33%
- 6M
- 5.92%
- 1Y
- 14.36%
- 3Y*
- 12.17%
- 5Y*
- 9.82%
- 10Y*
- —
XTAP vs. POCT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XTAP Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF | 11.19% | 17.58% | 14.26% | 23.46% | -14.68% | 11.87% |
POCT Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October | 5.33% | 11.00% | 9.54% | 20.12% | -1.26% | 6.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between XTAP and POCT is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2021 | 0.85 |
The correlation between XTAP and POCT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
XTAP vs. POCT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XTAP
POCT
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
XTAP
POCT
Financial Services
XTAP
POCT
Communication Services
XTAP
POCT
Consumer Cyclical
XTAP
POCT
Healthcare
XTAP
POCT
Industrials
XTAP
POCT
Consumer Defensive
XTAP
POCT
Energy
XTAP
POCT
Utilities
XTAP
POCT
Real Estate
XTAP
POCT
Basic Materials
XTAP
POCT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XTAP vs. POCT — Risk / Return Rank
XTAP
POCT
XTAP vs. POCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF (XTAP) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XTAP | POCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 4.67 | 2.35 | +2.32 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 8.08 | 3.38 | +4.70 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.28 | 1.47 | +0.80 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 15.52 | 3.28 | +12.24 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 82.64 | 16.84 | +65.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XTAP | POCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.67 | 2.35 | +2.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | 1.24 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.81 | 0.87 | -0.07 |
Drawdowns
XTAP vs. POCT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XTAP drawdown since its inception was -22.13%, which is greater than POCT's maximum drawdown of -18.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTAP and POCT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XTAP | POCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.13% | -18.80% | -3.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.42% | -4.40% | +2.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.83% | -10.22% | -1.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.13% | -10.22% | -11.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.20% | +0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.46% | -1.50% | -1.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.27% | 0.86% | -0.59% |
Volatility
XTAP vs. POCT - Volatility Comparison
Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF (XTAP) has a higher volatility of 1.20% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT) at 0.94%. This indicates that XTAP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than POCT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XTAP | POCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.20% | 0.94% | +0.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.15% | 4.77% | -1.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.69% | 6.17% | -1.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.54% | 7.94% | +6.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.41% | 10.22% | +4.19% |
XTAP vs. POCT - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XTAP and POCT have an expense ratio of 0.79%.
Dividends
XTAP vs. POCT - Dividend Comparison
Neither XTAP nor POCT has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POCT Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.21% |
XTAP Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XTAP and POCT have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XTAP has higher volatility (1.20%) compared to POCT (0.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XTAP dropped -22.13% vs POCT's -18.80%.
On 5-year performance, XTAP leads with 11.17% vs 9.82% for POCT. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, POCT has been the lower-risk option at 0.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, XTAP has performed better with a 11.17% return vs 9.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XTAP and POCT have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.
XTAP and POCT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
XTAP is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while POCT is Defined Outcome.
XTAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.67 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XTAP and POCT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer