PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XTAP vs. MUU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XTAP vs. MUU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF (XTAP) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XTAP achieves a 10.96% return, which is significantly lower than MUU's 961.23% return.


XTAP

1D
-0.21%
1M
2.32%
YTD
10.96%
6M
12.10%
1Y
21.00%
3Y*
17.90%
5Y*
10.99%
10Y*

MUU

1D
3.08%
1M
218.90%
YTD
961.23%
6M
1,422.01%
1Y
6,522.95%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XTAP vs. MUU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
XTAP
Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF
10.96%17.58%2.71%
MUU
Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares
961.23%599.03%-43.09%

Correlation

The correlation between XTAP and MUU is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2024

0.49

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XTAP vs. MUU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XTAP
XTAP Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
XTAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XTAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
XTAP Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
XTAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
XTAP Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

MUU
MUU Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
MUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUU Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
MUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUU Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XTAP vs. MUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF (XTAP) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XTAPMUUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

4.50

50.40

-45.90

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

7.78

7.17

+0.60

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

2.22

1.91

+0.31

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

14.82

125.85

-111.02

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

78.70

426.84

-348.14

XTAP vs. MUU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XTAP Sharpe Ratio is 4.50, which is lower than the MUU Sharpe Ratio of 50.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XTAP and MUU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XTAPMUUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.50

50.40

-45.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

6.68

-5.88

Drawdowns

XTAP vs. MUU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XTAP drawdown since its inception was -22.13%, smaller than the maximum MUU drawdown of -75.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTAP and MUU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XTAPMUUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.13%

-75.07%

+52.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.42%

-52.72%

+51.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.21%

0.00%

-0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.45%

-23.44%

+19.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.27%

15.51%

-15.24%

Volatility

XTAP vs. MUU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF (XTAP) is 1.10%, while Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU) has a volatility of 54.78%. This indicates that XTAP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XTAPMUUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.10%

54.78%

-53.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.16%

105.07%

-101.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.70%

131.77%

-127.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.54%

133.67%

-119.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.41%

133.67%

-119.26%

XTAP vs. MUU - Expense Ratio Comparison

XTAP has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than MUU's 1.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

XTAP vs. MUU - Dividend Comparison

XTAP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MUU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%.


PositionTTM20252024
MUU
Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares
0.46%4.27%0.31%
XTAP
Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XTAP and MUU have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MUU has higher volatility (54.78%) compared to XTAP (1.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XTAP dropped -22.13% vs MUU's -75.07%.

On 1-year performance, MUU leads with 6522.95% vs 21.00% for XTAP. On fees, XTAP is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, XTAP has been the lower-risk option at 1.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MUU has performed better with a 6522.95% return vs 21.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XTAP is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for MUU.

MUU has the higher dividend yield at 0.46%, compared with 0.00% for XTAP.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for XTAP and 1.06% for MUU.

MUU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (50.40 vs 4.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XTAP and MUU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer