XTAP vs. FUTG
XTAP (Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF) and FUTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XTAP charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for FUTG.
Performance
XTAP vs. FUTG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XTAP achieves a 10.96% return, which is significantly higher than FUTG's -75.53% return.
XTAP
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 2.32%
- YTD
- 10.96%
- 6M
- 12.10%
- 1Y
- 21.00%
- 3Y*
- 17.90%
- 5Y*
- 10.99%
- 10Y*
- —
FUTG
- 1D
- -11.10%
- 1M
- -70.24%
- YTD
- -75.53%
- 6M
- -77.00%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XTAP vs. FUTG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XTAP Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF | 10.96% | 2.90% |
FUTG Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF | -75.53% | -0.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between XTAP and FUTG is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XTAP vs. FUTG — Risk / Return Rank
XTAP
FUTG
XTAP vs. FUTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF (XTAP) and Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF (FUTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XTAP | FUTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.22 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 14.82 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 78.70 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XTAP | FUTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.80 | -0.66 | +1.46 |
Drawdowns
XTAP vs. FUTG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XTAP drawdown since its inception was -22.13%, smaller than the maximum FUTG drawdown of -86.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTAP and FUTG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XTAP | FUTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.13% | -86.19% | +64.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.42% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.83% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.13% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.21% | -84.29% | +84.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.45% | -40.35% | +36.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.27% | — | — |
Volatility
XTAP vs. FUTG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XTAP | FUTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.10% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.16% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.70% | 136.01% | -131.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.54% | 136.01% | -121.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.41% | 136.01% | -121.60% |
XTAP vs. FUTG - Expense Ratio Comparison
XTAP has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than FUTG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
XTAP vs. FUTG - Dividend Comparison
Neither XTAP nor FUTG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XTAP and FUTG have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FUTG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FUTG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for XTAP.
XTAP and FUTG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for XTAP and 0.75% for FUTG.
Find the right allocation for XTAP and FUTG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer