PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XTAP vs. FUTG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XTAP vs. FUTG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF (XTAP) and Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF (FUTG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XTAP achieves a 10.96% return, which is significantly higher than FUTG's -75.53% return.


XTAP

1D
-0.21%
1M
2.32%
YTD
10.96%
6M
12.10%
1Y
21.00%
3Y*
17.90%
5Y*
10.99%
10Y*

FUTG

1D
-11.10%
1M
-70.24%
YTD
-75.53%
6M
-77.00%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XTAP vs. FUTG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XTAP and FUTG is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025

0.50

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XTAP vs. FUTG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XTAP
XTAP Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
XTAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XTAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
XTAP Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
XTAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
XTAP Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

FUTG
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XTAP vs. FUTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF (XTAP) and Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF (FUTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XTAPFUTGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

14.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

78.70

XTAP vs. FUTG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XTAPFUTGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

-0.66

+1.46

Drawdowns

XTAP vs. FUTG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XTAP drawdown since its inception was -22.13%, smaller than the maximum FUTG drawdown of -86.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTAP and FUTG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XTAPFUTGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.13%

-86.19%

+64.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.21%

-84.29%

+84.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.45%

-40.35%

+36.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.27%

Volatility

XTAP vs. FUTG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XTAPFUTGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.70%

136.01%

-131.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.54%

136.01%

-121.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.41%

136.01%

-121.60%

XTAP vs. FUTG - Expense Ratio Comparison

XTAP has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than FUTG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

XTAP vs. FUTG - Dividend Comparison

Neither XTAP nor FUTG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XTAP and FUTG have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FUTG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FUTG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for XTAP.

XTAP and FUTG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for XTAP and 0.75% for FUTG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XTAP and FUTG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer