XTAP vs. BAPR

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

XTAP (Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF) and BAPR (Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April) are both exchange-traded funds - XTAP is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Innovator, while BAPR is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index April. XTAP is actively managed, while BAPR is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XTAP returned 11.17%/yr vs 11.17%/yr for BAPR. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.

Performance

XTAP vs. BAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF (XTAP) and Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XTAP having a 11.19% return and BAPR slightly lower at 10.81%.

XTAP

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 2.06%
• YTD: 11.19%
• 6M: 12.40%
• 1Y: 21.81%
• 3Y*: 17.98%
• 5Y*: 11.17%
• 10Y*: —

BAPR

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 2.21%
• YTD: 10.81%
• 6M: 11.74%
• 1Y: 20.12%
• 3Y*: 15.31%
• 5Y*: 11.17%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XTAP vs. BAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
XTAP Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF	11.19%	17.58%	14.26%	23.46%	-14.68%	11.87%
BAPR Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April	10.81%	8.28%	15.95%	23.16%	-7.04%	10.38%

Correlation

The correlation between XTAP and BAPR is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2021	0.94

The correlation between XTAP and BAPR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

XTAP vs. BAPR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XTAP	BAPR
Technology	33.6%	36.2%
Financial Services	12.2%	11.9%
Communication Services	10.5%	10.9%
Consumer Cyclical	10.0%	10.1%
Healthcare	9.5%	8.4%
Industrials	8.5%	8.1%
Consumer Defensive	5.3%	4.9%
Energy	4.0%	3.5%
Utilities	2.6%	2.3%
Real Estate	2.0%	1.9%
Basic Materials	1.9%	1.8%

Return for Risk

XTAP vs. BAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XTAP

XTAP Risk / Return Rank: 98
XTAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
XTAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
XTAP Omega Ratio Rank: 98
XTAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
XTAP Martin Ratio Rank: 98

BAPR

BAPR Risk / Return Rank: 96
BAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
BAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
BAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 97
BAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
BAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XTAP vs. BAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF (XTAP) and Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XTAP	BAPR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	4.67	3.59	+1.08
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	8.08	6.11	+1.97
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.28	1.87	+0.41
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	15.52	10.46	+5.06
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	82.64	57.55	+25.08
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XTAP vs. BAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XTAP Sharpe Ratio is 4.67, which is higher than the BAPR Sharpe Ratio of 3.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XTAP and BAPR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XTAP	BAPR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.67	3.59	+1.08
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77	0.98	-0.20
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.81	0.84	-0.03

Drawdowns

XTAP vs. BAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XTAP drawdown since its inception was -22.13%, smaller than the maximum BAPR drawdown of -23.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTAP and BAPR.

Drawdown Indicators

	XTAP	BAPR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.13%	-23.91%	+1.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.42%	-1.93%	+0.51%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.83%	-15.58%	+3.75%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.13%	-15.58%	-6.55%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.23%	+0.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.46%	-2.59%	-0.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.27%	0.35%	-0.08%

Volatility

XTAP vs. BAPR - Volatility Comparison

Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF (XTAP) has a higher volatility of 1.20% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR) at 1.06%. This indicates that XTAP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XTAP	BAPR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.20%	1.06%	+0.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.15%	4.53%	-1.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.69%	5.64%	-0.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.54%	11.49%	+3.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.41%	13.12%	+1.29%

XTAP vs. BAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XTAP and BAPR have an expense ratio of 0.79%.

Dividends

XTAP vs. BAPR - Dividend Comparison

Neither XTAP nor BAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XTAP and BAPR in my portfolio?

XTAP and BAPR have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XTAP or BAPR?

XTAP has higher volatility (1.20%) compared to BAPR (1.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XTAP dropped -22.13% vs BAPR's -23.91%.

Which ETF is better, XTAP or BAPR?

On 5-year performance, BAPR leads with 11.17% vs 11.17% for XTAP. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, BAPR has been the lower-risk option at 1.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XTAP or BAPR?

Over the 5-year period, BAPR has performed better with a 11.17% return vs 11.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XTAP or BAPR?

XTAP and BAPR have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XTAP or BAPR?

XTAP and BAPR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between XTAP and BAPR?

XTAP is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BAPR is Defined Outcome.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XTAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.67 vs 3.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.