XT vs. PSI
XT (iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF) and PSI (Invesco Semiconductors ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Exponential Technologies Index (Net), while PSI is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Dynamic Semiconductors Intellidex Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XT returned 14.88%/yr vs 35.27%/yr for PSI. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XT charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for PSI.
Performance
XT vs. PSI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XT achieves a 15.73% return, which is significantly lower than PSI's 116.16% return. Over the past 10 years, XT has underperformed PSI with an annualized return of 14.88%, while PSI has yielded a comparatively higher 35.27% annualized return.
XT
- 1D
- -2.84%
- 1M
- -0.34%
- YTD
- 15.73%
- 6M
- 14.43%
- 1Y
- 37.71%
- 3Y*
- 17.73%
- 5Y*
- 7.23%
- 10Y*
- 14.88%
PSI
- 1D
- -7.60%
- 1M
- 10.87%
- YTD
- 116.16%
- 6M
- 110.97%
- 1Y
- 200.81%
- 3Y*
- 58.76%
- 5Y*
- 32.86%
- 10Y*
- 35.27%
XT vs. PSI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XT iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF | 15.73% | 26.28% | 0.29% | 27.02% | -27.83% | 16.43% | 35.10% | 30.74% | -4.93% | 33.71% |
PSI Invesco Semiconductors ETF | 116.16% | 36.32% | 17.17% | 49.06% | -34.43% | 46.55% | 56.75% | 52.49% | -11.55% | 40.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between XT and PSI is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2015 | 0.82 |
The correlation between XT and PSI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
XT vs. PSI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XT
PSI
Technology
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Technology
XT
PSI
Healthcare
XT
PSI
-
Industrials
XT
PSI
Consumer Cyclical
XT
PSI
-
Utilities
XT
PSI
-
Communication Services
XT
PSI
-
Financial Services
XT
PSI
-
Basic Materials
XT
PSI
-
Energy
XT
PSI
-
Real Estate
XT
PSI
-
Consumer Defensive
XT
PSI
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XT vs. PSI — Risk / Return Rank
XT
PSI
XT vs. PSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT) and Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XT | PSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.61 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.63 | 13.06 | -9.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.43 | 45.36 | -30.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XT vs. PSI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XT drawdown since its inception was -34.41%, smaller than the maximum PSI drawdown of -62.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XT and PSI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XT | PSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.41% | -62.96% | +28.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.45% | -15.48% | +5.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.09% | -41.07% | +18.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.41% | -44.85% | +10.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.41% | -44.85% | +10.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.18% | -7.60% | +3.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.39% | -15.90% | +8.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.62% | 4.45% | -1.83% |
Volatility
XT vs. PSI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT) is 8.14%, while Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI) has a volatility of 21.88%. This indicates that XT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XT | PSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.14% | 21.88% | -13.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.78% | 35.15% | -21.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.32% | 42.19% | -24.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.00% | 38.84% | -17.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.12% | 35.61% | -15.49% |
XT vs. PSI - Expense Ratio Comparison
XT has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than PSI's 0.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
XT vs. PSI - Dividend Comparison
XT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.08%, more than PSI's 0.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSI Invesco Semiconductors ETF | 0.03% | 0.10% | 0.15% | 0.40% | 0.61% | 0.14% | 0.21% | 0.52% | 0.83% | 0.21% | 0.68% | 0.16% |
XT iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF | 7.08% | 7.95% | 0.66% | 0.41% | 0.78% | 0.84% | 0.77% | 1.55% | 1.40% | 0.97% | 1.37% | 1.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XT and PSI have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSI has higher volatility (21.88%) compared to XT (8.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XT dropped -34.41% vs PSI's -62.96%.
On 10-year performance, PSI leads with 35.27% vs 14.88% for XT. On fees, XT is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, XT has been the lower-risk option at 8.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PSI has performed better with a 35.27% return vs 14.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XT is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for PSI.
XT has the higher dividend yield at 7.08%, compared with 0.03% for PSI.
XT is categorized as Technology Equities, while PSI is Semiconductors. XT tracks Morningstar Exponential Technologies Index (Net), while PSI tracks Dynamic Semiconductors Intellidex Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for XT and 0.56% for PSI.
PSI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.79 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XT and PSI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer