PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XT vs. KROP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XT vs. KROP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT) and Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XT achieves a 20.20% return, which is significantly higher than KROP's 16.34% return.


XT

1D
-0.47%
1M
9.47%
YTD
20.20%
6M
20.54%
1Y
45.88%
3Y*
18.83%
5Y*
8.42%
10Y*
14.70%

KROP

1D
0.21%
1M
-0.06%
YTD
16.34%
6M
14.63%
1Y
13.67%
3Y*
0.81%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XT vs. KROP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
XT
iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF
20.20%26.28%0.29%27.02%-27.83%4.28%
KROP
Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF
16.34%7.95%-8.74%-23.86%-27.23%-18.75%

Correlation

The correlation between XT and KROP is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2021

0.59

Over the past year, the correlation between XT and KROP has dropped to 0.35 - well below their long-term average of 0.59, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

XT vs. KROP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XT
KROP

Technology

43.5%

-

Healthcare

23.4%
0.3%

Industrials

10.1%
39.7%

Consumer Cyclical

7.9%
0.3%

Communication Services

5.2%

-

Utilities

4.6%

-

Financial Services

3.3%

-

Basic Materials

2.0%
32.1%

Energy

0.3%

-

Real Estate

0.0%

-

Consumer Defensive

0.0%
26.3%

Technology

XT
43.5%
KROP

-

Healthcare

XT
23.4%
KROP
0.3%

Industrials

XT
10.1%
KROP
39.7%

Consumer Cyclical

XT
7.9%
KROP
0.3%

Communication Services

XT
5.2%
KROP

-

Utilities

XT
4.6%
KROP

-

Financial Services

XT
3.3%
KROP

-

Basic Materials

XT
2.0%
KROP
32.1%

Energy

XT
0.3%
KROP

-

Real Estate

XT
0.0%
KROP

-

Consumer Defensive

XT
0.0%
KROP
26.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XT vs. KROP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XT
XT Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
XT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
XT Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
XT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
XT Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

KROP
KROP Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
KROP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KROP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
KROP Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
KROP Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
KROP Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XT vs. KROP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT) and Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XTKROPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.16

+0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.41

1.22

+3.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.51

2.75

+15.76

XT vs. KROP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XT Sharpe Ratio is 2.89, which is higher than the KROP Sharpe Ratio of 0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XT and KROP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XTKROPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.89

0.86

+2.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

-0.57

+1.23

Drawdowns

XT vs. KROP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XT drawdown since its inception was -34.41%, smaller than the maximum KROP drawdown of -61.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XT and KROP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XTKROPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.41%

-61.96%

+27.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.45%

-11.29%

+0.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.09%

-28.70%

+6.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.47%

-49.05%

+48.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.41%

-44.50%

+37.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.49%

4.99%

-2.50%

Volatility

XT vs. KROP - Volatility Comparison

iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT) and Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP) have volatilities of 4.85% and 4.77%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XTKROPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.85%

4.77%

+0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.94%

12.01%

-0.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.99%

16.04%

-0.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.76%

22.28%

-1.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.08%

22.28%

-2.20%

XT vs. KROP - Expense Ratio Comparison

XT has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than KROP's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

XT vs. KROP - Dividend Comparison

XT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.61%, more than KROP's 2.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KROP
Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF
2.35%2.73%1.89%1.36%0.71%0.69%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XT
iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF
6.61%7.95%0.66%0.41%0.78%0.84%0.77%1.55%1.40%0.97%1.37%1.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


XT and KROP have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XT has higher volatility (4.85%) compared to KROP (4.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XT dropped -34.41% vs KROP's -61.96%.

On 3-year performance, XT leads with 18.83% vs 0.81% for KROP. On fees, XT is cheaper at 0.46% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, XT has performed better with a 18.83% return vs 0.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XT is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for KROP.

XT has the higher dividend yield at 6.61%, compared with 2.35% for KROP.

XT tracks Morningstar Exponential Technologies Index (Net), while KROP tracks Solactive AgTech & Food Innovation Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for XT and 0.50% for KROP.

XT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.89 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XT and KROP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer