XT vs. KROP

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

XT (iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF) and KROP (Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - XT tracks the Morningstar Exponential Technologies Index (Net) while KROP tracks the Solactive AgTech & Food Innovation Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XT returned 17.73%/yr vs -1.05%/yr for KROP. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XT charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for KROP.

Performance

XT vs. KROP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT) and Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XT achieves a 15.73% return, which is significantly higher than KROP's 11.60% return.

XT

• 1D: -2.84%
• 1M: -0.34%
• YTD: 15.73%
• 6M: 14.43%
• 1Y: 37.71%
• 3Y*: 17.73%
• 5Y*: 7.23%
• 10Y*: 14.88%

KROP

• 1D: -1.01%
• 1M: -1.85%
• YTD: 11.60%
• 6M: 11.45%
• 1Y: 7.63%
• 3Y*: -1.05%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XT vs. KROP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
XT iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF	15.73%	26.28%	0.29%	27.02%	-27.83%	4.46%
KROP Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF	11.60%	7.95%	-8.74%	-23.86%	-27.23%	-19.99%

Correlation

The correlation between XT and KROP is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.35
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.48
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2021	0.59

Over the past year, the correlation between XT and KROP has dropped to 0.35 - well below their long-term average of 0.59, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

XT vs. KROP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XT	KROP
Technology	46.7%	-
Healthcare	24.1%	0.3%
Industrials	7.7%	40.4%
Consumer Cyclical	7.4%	0.3%
Utilities	4.9%	-
Communication Services	4.1%	-
Financial Services	3.0%	-
Basic Materials	1.7%	32.0%
Energy	0.4%	-
Real Estate	0.0%	-
Consumer Defensive	0.0%	27.1%

Return for Risk

XT vs. KROP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XT

XT Risk / Return Rank: 72
XT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
XT Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
XT Omega Ratio Rank: 67
XT Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
XT Martin Ratio Rank: 78

KROP

KROP Risk / Return Rank: 16
KROP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
KROP Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
KROP Omega Ratio Rank: 15
KROP Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
KROP Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XT vs. KROP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT) and Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XT	KROP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.19	0.47	+1.72
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.90	0.79	+2.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.10	+0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.63	0.68	+2.95
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.43	1.46	+12.97

XT vs. KROP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XT Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is higher than the KROP Sharpe Ratio of 0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XT and KROP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XT vs. KROP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XT drawdown since its inception was -34.41%, smaller than the maximum KROP drawdown of -62.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XT and KROP.

Drawdown Indicators

	XT	KROP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.41%	-62.08%	+27.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.45%	-11.29%	+0.84%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.09%	-28.70%	+6.61%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.41%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.41%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.18%	-51.27%	+47.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.39%	-44.71%	+37.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.62%	5.23%	-2.61%

Volatility

XT vs. KROP - Volatility Comparison

iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT) has a higher volatility of 8.14% compared to Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP) at 4.54%. This indicates that XT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KROP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XT	KROP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.14%	4.54%	+3.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.78%	12.48%	+1.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.32%	16.19%	+1.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.00%	22.23%	-1.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.12%	22.23%	-2.11%

XT vs. KROP - Expense Ratio Comparison

XT has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than KROP's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

XT vs. KROP - Dividend Comparison

XT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.08%, more than KROP's 2.45% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
KROP Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF	2.45%	2.73%	1.89%	1.36%	0.71%	0.69%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XT iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF	7.08%	7.95%	0.66%	0.41%	0.78%	0.84%	0.77%	1.55%	1.40%	0.97%	1.37%	1.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XT and KROP in my portfolio?

XT and KROP have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XT or KROP?

XT has higher volatility (8.14%) compared to KROP (4.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XT dropped -34.41% vs KROP's -62.08%.

Which ETF is better, XT or KROP?

On 3-year performance, XT leads with 17.73% vs -1.05% for KROP. On fees, XT is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, KROP has been the lower-risk option at 4.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XT or KROP?

Over the 3-year period, XT has performed better with a 17.73% return vs -1.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XT or KROP?

XT is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for KROP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XT or KROP?

XT has the higher dividend yield at 7.08%, compared with 2.45% for KROP.

What is the main difference between XT and KROP?

XT tracks Morningstar Exponential Technologies Index (Net), while KROP tracks Solactive AgTech & Food Innovation Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for XT and 0.50% for KROP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.