XT vs. KNCT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XT (iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF) and KNCT (Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - XT tracks the Morningstar Exponential Technologies Index (Net) while KNCT tracks the STOXX World AC NexGen Connectivity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XT returned 14.70%/yr vs 21.42%/yr for KNCT. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XT charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for KNCT.

Performance

XT vs. KNCT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT) and Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (KNCT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XT achieves a 20.20% return, which is significantly lower than KNCT's 63.41% return. Over the past 10 years, XT has underperformed KNCT with an annualized return of 14.70%, while KNCT has yielded a comparatively higher 21.42% annualized return.

XT

• 1D: -0.47%
• 1M: 9.47%
• YTD: 20.20%
• 6M: 20.54%
• 1Y: 45.88%
• 3Y*: 18.83%
• 5Y*: 8.42%
• 10Y*: 14.70%

KNCT

• 1D: -0.63%
• 1M: 26.38%
• YTD: 63.41%
• 6M: 62.53%
• 1Y: 99.38%
• 3Y*: 43.36%
• 5Y*: 21.73%
• 10Y*: 21.42%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XT vs. KNCT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XT iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF	20.20%	26.28%	0.29%	27.02%	-27.83%	16.43%	35.10%	30.74%	-4.93%	33.71%
KNCT Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF	63.41%	28.65%	19.41%	27.39%	-29.54%	21.83%	39.14%	26.35%	5.78%	15.41%

Correlation

The correlation between XT and KNCT is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.86
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2015	0.81

The correlation between XT and KNCT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

XT vs. KNCT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XT	KNCT
Technology	43.5%	80.8%
Healthcare	23.4%	-
Industrials	10.1%	1.1%
Consumer Cyclical	7.9%	-
Communication Services	5.2%	14.0%
Utilities	4.6%	-
Financial Services	3.3%	0.2%
Basic Materials	2.0%	-
Energy	0.3%	-
Real Estate	0.0%	4.1%
Consumer Defensive	0.0%	-

Return for Risk

XT vs. KNCT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XT

XT Risk / Return Rank: 84
XT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
XT Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
XT Omega Ratio Rank: 79
XT Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
XT Martin Ratio Rank: 86

KNCT

KNCT Risk / Return Rank: 96
KNCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
KNCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
KNCT Omega Ratio Rank: 95
KNCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
KNCT Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XT vs. KNCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT) and Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (KNCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XT	KNCT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.89	4.70	-1.81
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.83	5.72	-1.89
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.76	-0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.41	10.00	-5.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.51	44.01	-25.50
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XT vs. KNCT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XT Sharpe Ratio is 2.89, which is lower than the KNCT Sharpe Ratio of 4.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XT and KNCT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XT	KNCT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.89	4.70	-1.81
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.41	0.94	-0.53
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.73	0.94	-0.20
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.66	0.58	+0.08

Drawdowns

XT vs. KNCT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XT drawdown since its inception was -34.41%, smaller than the maximum KNCT drawdown of -57.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XT and KNCT.

Drawdown Indicators

	XT	KNCT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.41%	-57.18%	+22.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.45%	-9.99%	-0.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.09%	-21.40%	-0.69%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.41%	-34.55%	+0.14%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.41%	-34.55%	+0.14%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.47%	-0.63%	+0.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.41%	-10.74%	+3.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.49%	2.27%	+0.22%

Volatility

XT vs. KNCT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT) is 4.85%, while Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (KNCT) has a volatility of 9.19%. This indicates that XT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KNCT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XT	KNCT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.85%	9.19%	-4.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.94%	17.12%	-5.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.99%	21.28%	-5.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.76%	23.19%	-2.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.08%	22.97%	-2.89%

XT vs. KNCT - Expense Ratio Comparison

XT has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than KNCT's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

XT vs. KNCT - Dividend Comparison

XT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.61%, more than KNCT's 0.57% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
KNCT Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF	0.57%	0.86%	1.38%	0.60%	2.24%	0.55%	0.18%	0.44%	1.22%	0.66%	0.44%	0.00%
XT iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF	6.61%	7.95%	0.66%	0.41%	0.78%	0.84%	0.77%	1.55%	1.40%	0.97%	1.37%	1.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XT and KNCT in my portfolio?

XT and KNCT have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XT or KNCT?

KNCT has higher volatility (9.19%) compared to XT (4.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XT dropped -34.41% vs KNCT's -57.18%.

Which ETF is better, XT or KNCT?

On 10-year performance, KNCT leads with 21.42% vs 14.70% for XT. On fees, KNCT is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, XT has been the lower-risk option at 4.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XT or KNCT?

Over the 10-year period, KNCT has performed better with a 21.42% return vs 14.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XT or KNCT?

KNCT is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for XT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XT or KNCT?

XT has the higher dividend yield at 6.61%, compared with 0.57% for KNCT.

What is the main difference between XT and KNCT?

XT tracks Morningstar Exponential Technologies Index (Net), while KNCT tracks STOXX World AC NexGen Connectivity Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for XT and 0.40% for KNCT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KNCT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.70 vs 2.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.