PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XT vs. FTEC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XT vs. FTEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XT achieves a 16.76% return, which is significantly lower than FTEC's 23.14% return. Over the past 10 years, XT has underperformed FTEC with an annualized return of 14.27%, while FTEC has yielded a comparatively higher 24.46% annualized return.


XT

1D
-1.61%
1M
0.51%
6M
12.33%
YTD
16.76%
1Y
33.81%
3Y*
15.71%
5Y*
7.17%
10Y*
14.27%

FTEC

1D
-2.12%
1M
-0.92%
6M
21.21%
YTD
23.14%
1Y
39.05%
3Y*
28.44%
5Y*
18.71%
10Y*
24.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XT vs. FTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XT
iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF
16.76%26.28%0.29%27.02%-27.83%16.43%35.10%30.74%-4.93%33.71%
FTEC
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
23.14%22.11%29.40%53.30%-29.59%30.49%45.83%48.93%-0.39%36.83%

Correlation

The correlation between XT and FTEC is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2015

0.87

The correlation between XT and FTEC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

XT vs. FTEC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XT
FTEC

Technology

43.5%
98.6%

Healthcare

26.9%

-

Industrials

7.8%
0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

7.5%
0.0%

Utilities

4.7%

-

Communication Services

4.1%
0.0%

Financial Services

3.0%
0.4%

Basic Materials

1.6%
0.0%

Energy

0.5%
0.3%

Real Estate

0.0%

-

Consumer Defensive

0.0%

-

Technology

XT
43.5%
FTEC
98.6%

Healthcare

XT
26.9%
FTEC

-

Industrials

XT
7.8%
FTEC
0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

XT
7.5%
FTEC
0.0%

Utilities

XT
4.7%
FTEC

-

Communication Services

XT
4.1%
FTEC
0.0%

Financial Services

XT
3.0%
FTEC
0.4%

Basic Materials

XT
1.6%
FTEC
0.0%

Energy

XT
0.5%
FTEC
0.3%

Real Estate

XT
0.0%
FTEC

-

Consumer Defensive

XT
0.0%
FTEC

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XT vs. FTEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XT
XT Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
XT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
XT Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
XT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
XT Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

FTEC
FTEC Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
FTEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTEC Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
FTEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTEC Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XT vs. FTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XTFTECDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.28

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.25

2.41

+0.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.61

7.04

+5.58

XT vs. FTEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XT Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is comparable to the FTEC Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XT and FTEC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XT vs. FTEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XT drawdown since its inception was -34.41%, roughly equal to the maximum FTEC drawdown of -34.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XT and FTEC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XTFTECDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.41%

-34.95%

+0.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.45%

-16.26%

+5.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.09%

-27.30%

+5.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.41%

-34.95%

+0.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.41%

-34.95%

+0.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.32%

-8.03%

+4.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.36%

-5.57%

-1.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.69%

5.56%

-2.87%

Volatility

XT vs. FTEC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT) is 6.67%, while Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) has a volatility of 9.63%. This indicates that XT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XTFTECDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.67%

9.63%

-2.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.11%

19.41%

-5.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.50%

23.43%

-5.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.05%

25.73%

-4.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.09%

24.90%

-4.81%

XT vs. FTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison

XT has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than FTEC's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

XT vs. FTEC - Dividend Comparison

XT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.02%, more than FTEC's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTEC
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
0.36%0.43%0.49%0.77%0.93%0.63%0.83%1.03%1.20%0.96%1.25%1.27%
XT
iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF
7.02%7.95%0.66%0.41%0.78%0.84%0.77%1.55%1.40%0.97%1.37%1.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


XT and FTEC have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTEC has higher volatility (9.63%) compared to XT (6.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XT dropped -34.41% vs FTEC's -34.95%.

On 10-year performance, FTEC leads with 24.46% vs 14.27% for XT. On fees, FTEC is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XT has been the lower-risk option at 6.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FTEC has performed better with a 24.46% return vs 14.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FTEC is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for XT.

XT has the higher dividend yield at 7.02%, compared with 0.36% for FTEC.

XT tracks Morningstar Exponential Technologies Index (Net), while FTEC tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for XT and 0.08% for FTEC.

XT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XT and FTEC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer