PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSVN vs. XHYH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XSVN vs. XHYH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BondBloxx Bloomberg Seven Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XSVN) and BondBloxx US High Yield Healthcare Sector ETF (XHYH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSVN achieves a -0.45% return, which is significantly lower than XHYH's 1.24% return.


XSVN

1D
0.12%
1M
-0.07%
YTD
-0.45%
6M
-0.64%
1Y
3.56%
3Y*
2.78%
5Y*
10Y*

XHYH

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.35%
YTD
1.24%
6M
1.15%
1Y
7.28%
3Y*
9.88%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSVN vs. XHYH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XSVN
BondBloxx Bloomberg Seven Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF
-0.45%8.18%-0.35%3.91%-1.71%
XHYH
BondBloxx US High Yield Healthcare Sector ETF
1.24%10.30%9.65%12.93%1.02%

Correlation

The correlation between XSVN and XHYH is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2022

0.43

Over the past year, the correlation between XSVN and XHYH has dropped to 0.18 - well below their long-term average of 0.43, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XSVN vs. XHYH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSVN
XSVN Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
XSVN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSVN Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSVN Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
XSVN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSVN Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

XHYH
XHYH Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
XHYH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XHYH Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
XHYH Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
XHYH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
XHYH Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSVN vs. XHYH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx Bloomberg Seven Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XSVN) and BondBloxx US High Yield Healthcare Sector ETF (XHYH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XSVNXHYHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.37

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.89

3.09

-2.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.67

12.30

-9.64

XSVN vs. XHYH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSVN Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is lower than the XHYH Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSVN and XHYH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XSVNXHYHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

1.88

-1.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.53

-0.18

Drawdowns

XSVN vs. XHYH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSVN drawdown since its inception was -9.45%, smaller than the maximum XHYH drawdown of -17.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSVN and XHYH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XSVNXHYHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.45%

-17.84%

+8.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.01%

-2.62%

-1.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.09%

-5.09%

-2.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.63%

-0.51%

-2.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.55%

-4.62%

+2.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.34%

0.66%

+0.68%

Volatility

XSVN vs. XHYH - Volatility Comparison

BondBloxx Bloomberg Seven Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XSVN) has a higher volatility of 1.54% compared to BondBloxx US High Yield Healthcare Sector ETF (XHYH) at 0.87%. This indicates that XSVN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XHYH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XSVNXHYHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.54%

0.87%

+0.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.22%

3.15%

+0.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.64%

4.32%

+0.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.19%

8.55%

-1.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.19%

8.55%

-1.36%

XSVN vs. XHYH - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSVN has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than XHYH's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

XSVN vs. XHYH - Dividend Comparison

XSVN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.10%, less than XHYH's 6.58% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
XHYH
BondBloxx US High Yield Healthcare Sector ETF
6.58%6.95%6.95%7.73%6.99%
XSVN
BondBloxx Bloomberg Seven Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF
4.10%4.06%4.17%3.49%1.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


XSVN and XHYH have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XSVN has higher volatility (1.54%) compared to XHYH (0.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSVN dropped -9.45% vs XHYH's -17.84%.

On 3-year performance, XHYH leads with 9.88% vs 2.78% for XSVN. On fees, XSVN is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, XHYH has been the lower-risk option at 0.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, XHYH has performed better with a 9.88% return vs 2.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XSVN is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XHYH.

XHYH has the higher dividend yield at 6.58%, compared with 4.10% for XSVN.

XSVN is categorized as Government Bonds, while XHYH is High Yield Bonds. XSVN tracks Bloomberg US Treasury 7 Year Target Duration Index, while XHYH tracks ICE Diversified US Cash Pay High Yield Healthcare Index. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for XSVN and 0.35% for XHYH.

XHYH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSVN and XHYH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer