PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSTC.L vs. XSNR.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XSTC.L vs. XSNR.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Europe Industrials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XSNR.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSTC.L achieves a 26.01% return, which is significantly higher than XSNR.L's 7.40% return.


XSTC.L

1D
-0.59%
1M
19.05%
YTD
26.01%
6M
25.07%
1Y
57.19%
3Y*
31.88%
5Y*
24.75%
10Y*

XSNR.L

1D
-0.61%
1M
-0.35%
YTD
7.40%
6M
10.50%
1Y
18.49%
3Y*
13.92%
5Y*
9.08%
10Y*
12.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSTC.L vs. XSNR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
XSTC.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D
26.01%14.31%39.50%48.82%-22.54%33.47%41.54%43.20%3.21%
XSNR.L
Xtrackers MSCI Europe Industrials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C
7.40%20.64%5.20%21.57%-14.54%21.19%12.17%27.37%-11.42%

Correlation

The correlation between XSTC.L and XSNR.L is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2018

0.58

The correlation between XSTC.L and XSNR.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (3 years) to 0.58 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XSTC.L vs. XSNR.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XSTC.L
XSNR.L

Technology

99.6%
0.5%

Industrials

0.2%
97.5%

Communication Services

0.1%
3.0%

Energy

0.1%
0.3%

Financial Services

0.1%
1.6%

Basic Materials

-

0.7%

Consumer Cyclical

-

0.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

0.5%

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

XSTC.L
99.6%
XSNR.L
0.5%

Industrials

XSTC.L
0.2%
XSNR.L
97.5%

Communication Services

XSTC.L
0.1%
XSNR.L
3.0%

Energy

XSTC.L
0.1%
XSNR.L
0.3%

Financial Services

XSTC.L
0.1%
XSNR.L
1.6%

Basic Materials

XSTC.L

-

XSNR.L
0.7%

Consumer Cyclical

XSTC.L

-

XSNR.L
0.5%

Consumer Defensive

XSTC.L

-

XSNR.L
0.5%

Healthcare

XSTC.L

-

XSNR.L

-

Real Estate

XSTC.L

-

XSNR.L

-

Utilities

XSTC.L

-

XSNR.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XSTC.L vs. XSNR.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSTC.L
XSTC.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
XSTC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSTC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSTC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
XSTC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSTC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

XSNR.L
XSNR.L Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
XSNR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSNR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSNR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
XSNR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSNR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSTC.L vs. XSNR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Europe Industrials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XSNR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XSTC.LXSNR.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.19

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.25

1.29

+1.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.36

4.56

+3.79

XSTC.L vs. XSNR.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSTC.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.92, which is higher than the XSNR.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSTC.L and XSNR.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XSTC.LXSNR.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.92

1.00

+1.92

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.12

0.48

+0.63

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.15

0.65

+0.50

Drawdowns

XSTC.L vs. XSNR.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSTC.L drawdown since its inception was -29.30%, smaller than the maximum XSNR.L drawdown of -36.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSTC.L and XSNR.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XSTC.LXSNR.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.30%

-36.07%

+6.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.49%

-14.30%

-3.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.30%

-17.10%

-12.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.30%

-27.20%

-2.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.59%

-3.71%

+3.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.30%

-6.09%

-0.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.82%

4.04%

+2.78%

Volatility

XSTC.L vs. XSNR.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Europe Industrials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XSNR.L) have volatilities of 6.44% and 6.24%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XSTC.LXSNR.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.44%

6.24%

+0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.26%

15.19%

-0.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.60%

18.47%

+1.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.20%

18.87%

+3.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.42%

18.90%

+3.52%

XSTC.L vs. XSNR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSTC.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than XSNR.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XSTC.L vs. XSNR.L - Dividend Comparison

XSTC.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%, while XSNR.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
XSNR.L
Xtrackers MSCI Europe Industrials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XSTC.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D
0.25%0.33%0.37%0.53%1.08%0.53%0.63%0.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


XSTC.L and XSNR.L have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XSTC.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XSTC.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XSNR.L.

XSTC.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while XSNR.L is Industrials Equities. XSTC.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while XSNR.L tracks MSCI World/Materials NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XSTC.L and 0.20% for XSNR.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSTC.L and XSNR.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer