XSTC.L vs. XNAS.L
XSTC.L (Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D) and XNAS.L (Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XSTC.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while XNAS.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XSTC.L returned 31.88%/yr vs 25.37%/yr for XNAS.L. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XSTC.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XNAS.L.
Performance
XSTC.L vs. XNAS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XSTC.L is traded in GBp, while XNAS.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XNAS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSTC.L achieves a 26.01% return, which is significantly higher than XNAS.L's 20.64% return.
XSTC.L
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- 19.05%
- YTD
- 26.01%
- 6M
- 25.07%
- 1Y
- 57.19%
- 3Y*
- 31.88%
- 5Y*
- 24.75%
- 10Y*
- —
XNAS.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 11.29%
- YTD
- 20.64%
- 6M
- 19.16%
- 1Y
- 42.60%
- 3Y*
- 25.37%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XSTC.L vs. XNAS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSTC.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D | 26.01% | 14.31% | 39.50% | 48.82% | -6.03% |
XNAS.L Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF | 20.93% | 11.29% | 28.81% | 48.59% | -8.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSTC.L and XNAS.L is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2022 | 0.91 |
The correlation between XSTC.L and XNAS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
XSTC.L vs. XNAS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XSTC.L
XNAS.L
Technology
Industrials
Communication Services
Energy
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
XSTC.L
XNAS.L
Industrials
XSTC.L
XNAS.L
Communication Services
XSTC.L
XNAS.L
Energy
XSTC.L
XNAS.L
Financial Services
XSTC.L
XNAS.L
Basic Materials
XSTC.L
-
XNAS.L
Consumer Cyclical
XSTC.L
-
XNAS.L
Consumer Defensive
XSTC.L
-
XNAS.L
Healthcare
XSTC.L
-
XNAS.L
Real Estate
XSTC.L
-
XNAS.L
Utilities
XSTC.L
-
XNAS.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XSTC.L vs. XNAS.L — Risk / Return Rank
XSTC.L
XNAS.L
XSTC.L vs. XNAS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L) and Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XNAS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XSTC.L | XNAS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.48 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.25 | 3.81 | -0.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.36 | 10.83 | -2.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XSTC.L | XNAS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.92 | 2.68 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.12 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.15 | 1.41 | -0.25 |
Drawdowns
XSTC.L vs. XNAS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSTC.L drawdown since its inception was -29.30%, which is greater than XNAS.L's maximum drawdown of -24.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSTC.L and XNAS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSTC.L | XNAS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.30% | -24.49% | -4.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.49% | -11.08% | -6.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.30% | -24.49% | -4.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.59% | 0.00% | -0.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.30% | -3.86% | -2.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.82% | 3.91% | +2.91% |
Volatility
XSTC.L vs. XNAS.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L) has a higher volatility of 6.44% compared to Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XNAS.L) at 4.89%. This indicates that XSTC.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XNAS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XSTC.L | XNAS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.44% | 4.89% | +1.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.26% | 11.46% | +2.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.60% | 15.82% | +3.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.20% | 18.99% | +3.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.42% | 18.99% | +3.43% |
XSTC.L vs. XNAS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSTC.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than XNAS.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XSTC.L vs. XNAS.L - Dividend Comparison
XSTC.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%, while XNAS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XNAS.L Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XSTC.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D | 0.25% | 0.33% | 0.37% | 0.53% | 1.08% | 0.53% | 0.63% | 0.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XSTC.L and XNAS.L have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XSTC.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XSTC.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XNAS.L.
XSTC.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while XNAS.L is Nasdaq-100. XSTC.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while XNAS.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XSTC.L and 0.20% for XNAS.L.
Find the right allocation for XSTC.L and XNAS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer