PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSTC.L vs. ECAR.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XSTC.L vs. ECAR.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L) and iShares Electric Vehicles and Driving Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ECAR.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XSTC.L is traded in GBp, while ECAR.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ECAR.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSTC.L achieves a 26.01% return, which is significantly lower than ECAR.L's 61.55% return.


XSTC.L

1D
-0.59%
1M
19.05%
YTD
26.01%
6M
25.07%
1Y
57.19%
3Y*
31.88%
5Y*
24.75%
10Y*

ECAR.L

1D
0.61%
1M
24.63%
YTD
61.55%
6M
63.54%
1Y
99.07%
3Y*
24.74%
5Y*
14.11%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSTC.L vs. ECAR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
XSTC.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D
26.01%14.31%39.50%48.82%-22.54%33.47%41.54%28.17%
ECAR.L
iShares Electric Vehicles and Driving Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
61.55%15.47%0.80%20.74%-18.63%17.26%29.76%3.61%

Correlation

The correlation between XSTC.L and ECAR.L is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2019

0.67

The correlation between XSTC.L and ECAR.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

XSTC.L vs. ECAR.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XSTC.L
ECAR.L

Technology

99.6%
66.1%

Industrials

0.2%
4.8%

Communication Services

0.1%

-

Energy

0.1%

-

Financial Services

0.1%

-

Basic Materials

-

0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

-

28.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

XSTC.L
99.6%
ECAR.L
66.1%

Industrials

XSTC.L
0.2%
ECAR.L
4.8%

Communication Services

XSTC.L
0.1%
ECAR.L

-

Energy

XSTC.L
0.1%
ECAR.L

-

Financial Services

XSTC.L
0.1%
ECAR.L

-

Basic Materials

XSTC.L

-

ECAR.L
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

XSTC.L

-

ECAR.L
28.6%

Consumer Defensive

XSTC.L

-

ECAR.L

-

Healthcare

XSTC.L

-

ECAR.L

-

Real Estate

XSTC.L

-

ECAR.L

-

Utilities

XSTC.L

-

ECAR.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XSTC.L vs. ECAR.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSTC.L
XSTC.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
XSTC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSTC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSTC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
XSTC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSTC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

ECAR.L
ECAR.L Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
ECAR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ECAR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
ECAR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
ECAR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
ECAR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSTC.L vs. ECAR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L) and iShares Electric Vehicles and Driving Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ECAR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XSTC.LECAR.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.62

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.25

7.96

-4.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.36

24.25

-15.90

XSTC.L vs. ECAR.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSTC.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.92, which is comparable to the ECAR.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSTC.L and ECAR.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XSTC.LECAR.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.92

3.99

-1.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.12

0.62

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.15

0.66

+0.49

Drawdowns

XSTC.L vs. ECAR.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSTC.L drawdown since its inception was -29.30%, smaller than the maximum ECAR.L drawdown of -35.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSTC.L and ECAR.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XSTC.LECAR.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.30%

-35.94%

+6.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.49%

-12.38%

-5.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.30%

-28.42%

-0.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.30%

-28.74%

-0.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.59%

0.00%

-0.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.30%

-8.68%

+2.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.82%

4.07%

+2.75%

Volatility

XSTC.L vs. ECAR.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L) is 6.44%, while iShares Electric Vehicles and Driving Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ECAR.L) has a volatility of 11.93%. This indicates that XSTC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ECAR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XSTC.LECAR.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.44%

11.93%

-5.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.26%

20.17%

-5.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.60%

24.75%

-5.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.20%

22.87%

-0.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.42%

23.91%

-1.49%

XSTC.L vs. ECAR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSTC.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than ECAR.L's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

XSTC.L vs. ECAR.L - Dividend Comparison

XSTC.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%, while ECAR.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
ECAR.L
iShares Electric Vehicles and Driving Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XSTC.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D
0.25%0.33%0.37%0.53%1.08%0.53%0.63%0.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


XSTC.L and ECAR.L have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XSTC.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XSTC.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for ECAR.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XSTC.L and 0.40% for ECAR.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSTC.L and ECAR.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer