XST.TO vs. MART
XST.TO (iShares S&P/TSX Capped Consumer Staples Index ETF) and MART (Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Mar ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XST.TO is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Gbl GR CAD, while MART is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Allianz. XST.TO is passively managed, while MART is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, XST.TO returned 13.98%/yr vs 17.81%/yr for MART. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XST.TO charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for MART.
Performance
XST.TO vs. MART - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XST.TO is traded in CAD, while MART is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MART values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XST.TO achieves a 1.77% return, which is significantly lower than MART's 9.90% return.
XST.TO
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 1.37%
- YTD
- 1.77%
- 6M
- 0.81%
- 1Y
- 7.32%
- 3Y*
- 13.98%
- 5Y*
- 12.73%
- 10Y*
- 9.62%
MART
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- 4.60%
- YTD
- 9.90%
- 6M
- 8.99%
- 1Y
- 22.14%
- 3Y*
- 17.81%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XST.TO vs. MART - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XST.TO iShares S&P/TSX Capped Consumer Staples Index ETF | 1.77% | 16.38% | 19.83% | 4.39% |
MART Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Mar ETF | 9.90% | 9.66% | 25.54% | 13.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between XST.TO and MART is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2023 | 0.20 |
The correlation between XST.TO and MART shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XST.TO vs. MART - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XST.TO
MART
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
XST.TO
MART
Consumer Cyclical
XST.TO
MART
Basic Materials
XST.TO
-
MART
Communication Services
XST.TO
-
MART
Energy
XST.TO
-
MART
Financial Services
XST.TO
-
MART
Healthcare
XST.TO
-
MART
Industrials
XST.TO
-
MART
Real Estate
XST.TO
-
MART
Technology
XST.TO
-
MART
Utilities
XST.TO
-
MART
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XST.TO vs. MART — Risk / Return Rank
XST.TO
MART
XST.TO vs. MART - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P/TSX Capped Consumer Staples Index ETF (XST.TO) and Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Mar ETF (MART). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XST.TO | MART | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.61 | -0.51 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.70 | 5.96 | -5.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.65 | 21.97 | -20.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XST.TO | MART | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 | 2.96 | -2.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.99 | 1.90 | -0.91 |
Drawdowns
XST.TO vs. MART - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XST.TO drawdown since its inception was -22.65%, which is greater than MART's maximum drawdown of -12.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XST.TO and MART.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XST.TO | MART | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.65% | -12.90% | -9.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.52% | -3.73% | -6.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.86% | -12.90% | +2.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.86% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.65% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.39% | 0.00% | -6.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.21% | -1.21% | -2.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.44% | 1.01% | +3.43% |
Volatility
XST.TO vs. MART - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P/TSX Capped Consumer Staples Index ETF (XST.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.72% compared to Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Mar ETF (MART) at 1.32%. This indicates that XST.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MART based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XST.TO | MART | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.72% | 1.32% | +3.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.99% | 5.90% | +6.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.12% | 7.51% | +8.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.22% | 9.62% | +4.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.95% | 9.62% | +5.33% |
XST.TO vs. MART - Expense Ratio Comparison
XST.TO has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is lower than MART's 0.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
XST.TO vs. MART - Dividend Comparison
XST.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, while MART has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MART Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Mar ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XST.TO iShares S&P/TSX Capped Consumer Staples Index ETF | 0.68% | 0.67% | 0.86% | 0.79% | 0.74% | 0.68% | 0.74% | 0.73% | 0.81% | 0.90% | 0.52% | 0.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XST.TO and MART have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XST.TO is cheaper at 0.61% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XST.TO is cheaper with a 0.61% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for MART.
XST.TO is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while MART is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Allianz. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for XST.TO and 0.74% for MART.
Find the right allocation for XST.TO and MART
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer