PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XST.TO vs. MART
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XST.TO vs. MART - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares S&P/TSX Capped Consumer Staples Index ETF (XST.TO) and Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Mar ETF (MART). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XST.TO is traded in CAD, while MART is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MART values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XST.TO achieves a 1.77% return, which is significantly lower than MART's 9.90% return.


XST.TO

1D
0.28%
1M
1.37%
YTD
1.77%
6M
0.81%
1Y
7.32%
3Y*
13.98%
5Y*
12.73%
10Y*
9.62%

MART

1D
0.30%
1M
4.60%
YTD
9.90%
6M
8.99%
1Y
22.14%
3Y*
17.81%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XST.TO vs. MART - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
XST.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Capped Consumer Staples Index ETF
1.77%16.38%19.83%4.39%
MART
Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Mar ETF
9.90%9.66%25.54%13.95%

Correlation

The correlation between XST.TO and MART is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2023

0.20

The correlation between XST.TO and MART shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XST.TO vs. MART - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XST.TO
MART

Consumer Defensive

74.9%
4.9%

Consumer Cyclical

25.1%
10.1%

Basic Materials

-

1.8%

Communication Services

-

10.9%

Energy

-

3.5%

Financial Services

-

11.9%

Healthcare

-

8.4%

Industrials

-

8.1%

Real Estate

-

1.9%

Technology

-

36.2%

Utilities

-

2.3%

Consumer Defensive

XST.TO
74.9%
MART
4.9%

Consumer Cyclical

XST.TO
25.1%
MART
10.1%

Basic Materials

XST.TO

-

MART
1.8%

Communication Services

XST.TO

-

MART
10.9%

Energy

XST.TO

-

MART
3.5%

Financial Services

XST.TO

-

MART
11.9%

Healthcare

XST.TO

-

MART
8.4%

Industrials

XST.TO

-

MART
8.1%

Real Estate

XST.TO

-

MART
1.9%

Technology

XST.TO

-

MART
36.2%

Utilities

XST.TO

-

MART
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XST.TO vs. MART — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XST.TO
XST.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
XST.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XST.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
XST.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
XST.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
XST.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

MART
MART Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
MART Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MART Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
MART Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
MART Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
MART Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XST.TO vs. MART - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P/TSX Capped Consumer Staples Index ETF (XST.TO) and Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Mar ETF (MART). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XST.TOMARTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.61

-0.51

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.70

5.96

-5.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.65

21.97

-20.32

XST.TO vs. MART - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XST.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.46, which is lower than the MART Sharpe Ratio of 2.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XST.TO and MART, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XST.TOMARTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

2.96

-2.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.99

1.90

-0.91

Drawdowns

XST.TO vs. MART - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XST.TO drawdown since its inception was -22.65%, which is greater than MART's maximum drawdown of -12.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XST.TO and MART.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XST.TOMARTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.65%

-12.90%

-9.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.52%

-3.73%

-6.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.86%

-12.90%

+2.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.39%

0.00%

-6.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.21%

-1.21%

-2.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.44%

1.01%

+3.43%

Volatility

XST.TO vs. MART - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P/TSX Capped Consumer Staples Index ETF (XST.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.72% compared to Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Mar ETF (MART) at 1.32%. This indicates that XST.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MART based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XST.TOMARTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.72%

1.32%

+3.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.99%

5.90%

+6.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.12%

7.51%

+8.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.22%

9.62%

+4.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.95%

9.62%

+5.33%

XST.TO vs. MART - Expense Ratio Comparison

XST.TO has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is lower than MART's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

XST.TO vs. MART - Dividend Comparison

XST.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, while MART has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MART
Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Mar ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XST.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Capped Consumer Staples Index ETF
0.68%0.67%0.86%0.79%0.74%0.68%0.74%0.73%0.81%0.90%0.52%0.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


XST.TO and MART have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XST.TO is cheaper at 0.61% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XST.TO is cheaper with a 0.61% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for MART.

XST.TO is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while MART is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Allianz. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for XST.TO and 0.74% for MART.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XST.TO and MART

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer