PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSSW.L vs. VPNG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XSSW.L vs. VPNG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Communication Services UCITS ETF 1C GBP (XSSW.L) and Global X Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VPNG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSSW.L achieves a 3.87% return, which is significantly lower than VPNG.L's 50.78% return.


XSSW.L

1D
1.00%
1M
-0.30%
YTD
3.87%
6M
2.52%
1Y
25.90%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VPNG.L

1D
-1.94%
1M
10.12%
YTD
50.78%
6M
51.37%
1Y
81.99%
3Y*
31.82%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSSW.L vs. VPNG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XSSW.L and VPNG.L is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2023

0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XSSW.L vs. VPNG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSSW.L
XSSW.L Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
XSSW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSSW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSSW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
XSSW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSSW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

VPNG.L
VPNG.L Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
VPNG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VPNG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
VPNG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
VPNG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
VPNG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSSW.L vs. VPNG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Communication Services UCITS ETF 1C GBP (XSSW.L) and Global X Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VPNG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XSSW.LVPNG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.58

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.87

5.73

-2.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.02

19.68

-8.66

XSSW.L vs. VPNG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSSW.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is lower than the VPNG.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSSW.L and VPNG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XSSW.LVPNG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.95

3.66

-1.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.57

0.71

+0.86

Drawdowns

XSSW.L vs. VPNG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSSW.L drawdown since its inception was -20.71%, smaller than the maximum VPNG.L drawdown of -26.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSSW.L and VPNG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XSSW.LVPNG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.71%

-26.74%

+6.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.98%

-14.22%

+5.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.17%

-1.94%

-1.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.07%

-11.45%

+8.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.35%

4.15%

-1.80%

Volatility

XSSW.L vs. VPNG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Communication Services UCITS ETF 1C GBP (XSSW.L) is 3.93%, while Global X Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VPNG.L) has a volatility of 6.89%. This indicates that XSSW.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VPNG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XSSW.LVPNG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.93%

6.89%

-2.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.42%

16.34%

-6.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.23%

22.38%

-9.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.69%

20.73%

-5.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.69%

20.73%

-5.04%

XSSW.L vs. VPNG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSSW.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than VPNG.L's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

XSSW.L vs. VPNG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XSSW.L nor VPNG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XSSW.L and VPNG.L have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XSSW.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XSSW.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for VPNG.L.

XSSW.L is categorized as Communications Equities, while VPNG.L is Technology Equities. XSSW.L tracks MSCI World Communication Services 20-35 Custom Index, while VPNG.L tracks Solactive Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure v2 Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XSSW.L and 0.50% for VPNG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSSW.L and VPNG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer