XSSW.L vs. XLCS.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers MSCI World Communication Services UCITS ETF 1C GBP (XSSW.L) and Invesco Communications S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLCS.L).
XSSW.L and XLCS.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XSSW.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI World Communication Services 20-35 Custom Index. It was launched on Mar 16, 2016. XLCS.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Communications Services Index. It was launched on Sep 17, 2018. Both XSSW.L and XLCS.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
XSSW.L vs. XLCS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XSSW.L vs. XLCS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XSSW.L Xtrackers MSCI World Communication Services UCITS ETF 1C GBP | -4.75% | 20.12% | 36.87% | 8.80% |
XLCS.L Invesco Communications S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc | -2.65% | 10.64% | 40.10% | 9.12% |
Different Trading Currencies
XSSW.L is traded in GBP, while XLCS.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XLCS.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSSW.L achieves a -4.75% return, which is significantly lower than XLCS.L's -2.65% return.
XSSW.L
- 1D
- 1.42%
- 1M
- -5.34%
- YTD
- -4.75%
- 6M
- -1.77%
- 1Y
- 24.03%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLCS.L
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- -3.73%
- YTD
- -2.65%
- 6M
- -4.35%
- 1Y
- 13.12%
- 3Y*
- 23.15%
- 5Y*
- 9.49%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XSSW.L vs. XLCS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSSW.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than XLCS.L's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
XSSW.L vs. XLCS.L — Risk / Return Rank
XSSW.L
XLCS.L
XSSW.L vs. XLCS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Communication Services UCITS ETF 1C GBP (XSSW.L) and Invesco Communications S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLCS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XSSW.L | XLCS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.51 | 0.80 | +0.71 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.21 | 1.21 | +1.00 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.15 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.43 | 1.29 | +1.14 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.51 | 3.33 | +5.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XSSW.L | XLCS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.51 | 0.80 | +0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.41 | 0.68 | +0.74 |
Correlation
The correlation between XSSW.L and XLCS.L is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
XSSW.L vs. XLCS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XSSW.L nor XLCS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
XSSW.L vs. XLCS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSSW.L drawdown since its inception was -20.71%, smaller than the maximum XLCS.L drawdown of -38.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSSW.L and XLCS.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSSW.L | XLCS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.71% | -47.62% | +26.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.98% | -10.09% | +1.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -47.62% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.83% | -8.21% | +1.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.18% | -10.65% | +7.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.56% | 3.91% | -1.35% |
Volatility
XSSW.L vs. XLCS.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Communication Services UCITS ETF 1C GBP (XSSW.L) is 4.47%, while Invesco Communications S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLCS.L) has a volatility of 4.75%. This indicates that XSSW.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLCS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XSSW.L | XLCS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.47% | 4.75% | -0.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.56% | 9.85% | -0.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.91% | 16.32% | -0.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.82% | 19.49% | -3.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.82% | 20.44% | -4.62% |