PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSSW.L vs. IISU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XSSW.L vs. IISU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Communication Services UCITS ETF 1C GBP (XSSW.L) and iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IISU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XSSW.L is traded in GBP, while IISU.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IISU.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSSW.L achieves a 3.87% return, which is significantly lower than IISU.L's 12.64% return.


XSSW.L

1D
1.00%
1M
-0.30%
YTD
3.87%
6M
2.52%
1Y
25.90%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IISU.L

1D
-0.05%
1M
2.79%
YTD
12.64%
6M
13.01%
1Y
24.29%
3Y*
18.78%
5Y*
13.38%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSSW.L vs. IISU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
XSSW.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Communication Services UCITS ETF 1C GBP
3.87%20.12%36.87%8.80%
IISU.L
iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
12.64%11.24%19.29%5.27%

Correlation

The correlation between XSSW.L and IISU.L is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2023

0.42

The correlation between XSSW.L and IISU.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (1 year) to 0.42 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XSSW.L vs. IISU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSSW.L
XSSW.L Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
XSSW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSSW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSSW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
XSSW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSSW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

IISU.L
IISU.L Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
IISU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IISU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
IISU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
IISU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
IISU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSSW.L vs. IISU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Communication Services UCITS ETF 1C GBP (XSSW.L) and iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IISU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XSSW.LIISU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.32

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.87

2.58

+0.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.02

8.22

+2.80

XSSW.L vs. IISU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSSW.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is comparable to the IISU.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSSW.L and IISU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XSSW.LIISU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.95

1.83

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.57

0.64

+0.93

Drawdowns

XSSW.L vs. IISU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSSW.L drawdown since its inception was -20.71%, smaller than the maximum IISU.L drawdown of -34.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSSW.L and IISU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XSSW.LIISU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.71%

-34.66%

+13.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.98%

-9.36%

+0.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.17%

-1.34%

-1.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.07%

-4.51%

+1.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.35%

2.95%

-0.60%

Volatility

XSSW.L vs. IISU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Communication Services UCITS ETF 1C GBP (XSSW.L) is 3.93%, while iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IISU.L) has a volatility of 4.54%. This indicates that XSSW.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IISU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XSSW.LIISU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.93%

4.54%

-0.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.42%

10.37%

-0.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.23%

13.25%

-0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.69%

15.96%

-0.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.69%

18.65%

-2.96%

XSSW.L vs. IISU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSSW.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than IISU.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XSSW.L vs. IISU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XSSW.L nor IISU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XSSW.L and IISU.L have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IISU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IISU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XSSW.L.

XSSW.L is categorized as Communications Equities, while IISU.L is Industrials Equities. XSSW.L tracks MSCI World Communication Services 20-35 Custom Index, while IISU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Industrials Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XSSW.L and 0.15% for IISU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSSW.L and IISU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer