PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSPX.L vs. I500.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XSPX.L vs. I500.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XSPX.L) and iShares S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF (I500.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XSPX.L is traded in GBp, while I500.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the I500.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XSPX.L having a 10.56% return and I500.L slightly higher at 10.61%.


XSPX.L

1D
-0.01%
1M
4.53%
YTD
10.56%
6M
9.85%
1Y
29.08%
3Y*
19.11%
5Y*
15.05%
10Y*
16.30%

I500.L

1D
0.05%
1M
4.55%
YTD
10.61%
6M
9.88%
1Y
29.25%
3Y*
19.22%
5Y*
15.15%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSPX.L vs. I500.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
XSPX.L
Xtrackers S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF 1C
10.56%9.46%27.43%19.97%-8.90%31.28%5.71%
I500.L
iShares S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF
10.61%9.56%27.57%20.04%-8.74%31.23%5.72%

Correlation

The correlation between XSPX.L and I500.L is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2020

1.00

The correlation between XSPX.L and I500.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

XSPX.L vs. I500.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XSPX.L
I500.L

Technology

35.6%
35.6%

Financial Services

11.8%
11.8%

Communication Services

11.2%
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
10.1%

Healthcare

8.5%
8.5%

Industrials

8.3%
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.9%

Energy

3.5%
3.5%

Utilities

2.4%
2.4%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.9%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.8%

Technology

XSPX.L
35.6%
I500.L
35.6%

Financial Services

XSPX.L
11.8%
I500.L
11.8%

Communication Services

XSPX.L
11.2%
I500.L
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

XSPX.L
10.1%
I500.L
10.1%

Healthcare

XSPX.L
8.5%
I500.L
8.5%

Industrials

XSPX.L
8.3%
I500.L
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

XSPX.L
4.9%
I500.L
4.9%

Energy

XSPX.L
3.5%
I500.L
3.5%

Utilities

XSPX.L
2.4%
I500.L
2.4%

Real Estate

XSPX.L
1.9%
I500.L
1.9%

Basic Materials

XSPX.L
1.8%
I500.L
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XSPX.L vs. I500.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSPX.L
XSPX.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
XSPX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSPX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSPX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
XSPX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSPX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

I500.L
I500.L Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
I500.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
I500.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
I500.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
I500.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
I500.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSPX.L vs. I500.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XSPX.L) and iShares S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF (I500.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XSPX.LI500.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.52

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.98

4.13

-0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.33

15.23

-0.90

XSPX.L vs. I500.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSPX.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.76, which is comparable to the I500.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSPX.L and I500.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XSPX.LI500.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.76

2.81

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.05

1.07

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.99

1.13

-0.14

Drawdowns

XSPX.L vs. I500.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSPX.L drawdown since its inception was -25.50%, which is greater than I500.L's maximum drawdown of -20.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSPX.L and I500.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XSPX.LI500.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.50%

-20.75%

-4.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.28%

-7.08%

-0.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.09%

-20.75%

-0.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.09%

-20.75%

-0.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.23%

-0.23%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.37%

-3.35%

-0.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.03%

1.92%

+0.11%

Volatility

XSPX.L vs. I500.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XSPX.L) and iShares S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF (I500.L) have volatilities of 2.62% and 2.59%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XSPX.LI500.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.62%

2.59%

+0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.15%

7.12%

+0.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.49%

10.40%

+0.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.28%

14.21%

+0.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.53%

14.30%

+1.23%

XSPX.L vs. I500.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSPX.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than I500.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XSPX.L vs. I500.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XSPX.L nor I500.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, XSPX.L and I500.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, I500.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

I500.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for XSPX.L.

XSPX.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while I500.L tracks S&P 500 Net Dividends Reinvested Index (Net USD). They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for XSPX.L and 0.07% for I500.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSPX.L and I500.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer