XSPR.L vs. XLIS.L
XSPR.L (Xtrackers MSCI Europe Materials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C) and XLIS.L (Invesco Industrials S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc) are both Industrials Equities funds - XSPR.L tracks the MSCI World/Materials NR USD while XLIS.L tracks the S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Industrials Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XSPR.L returned 13.21%/yr vs 14.13%/yr for XLIS.L. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XSPR.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for XLIS.L.
Performance
XSPR.L vs. XLIS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XSPR.L is traded in GBp, while XLIS.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XLIS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSPR.L achieves a 8.03% return, which is significantly lower than XLIS.L's 13.00% return. Over the past 10 years, XSPR.L has underperformed XLIS.L with an annualized return of 13.21%, while XLIS.L has yielded a comparatively higher 14.13% annualized return.
XSPR.L
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- 6.58%
- YTD
- 8.03%
- 6M
- 10.27%
- 1Y
- 11.13%
- 3Y*
- 10.17%
- 5Y*
- 4.17%
- 10Y*
- 13.21%
XLIS.L
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 2.71%
- YTD
- 13.00%
- 6M
- 12.94%
- 1Y
- 24.34%
- 3Y*
- 18.86%
- 5Y*
- 13.40%
- 10Y*
- 14.13%
XSPR.L vs. XLIS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSPR.L Xtrackers MSCI Europe Materials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C | 8.03% | 14.12% | -6.12% | 16.07% | -7.66% | 18.51% | 17.88% | 16.55% | -11.25% | 26.40% |
XLIS.L Invesco Industrials S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc | 13.00% | 10.85% | 19.35% | 12.03% | 6.10% | 21.68% | 6.68% | 23.83% | -9.15% | 9.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSPR.L and XLIS.L is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2011 | 0.38 |
XSPR.L vs. XLIS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XSPR.L
XLIS.L
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Basic Materials
XSPR.L
XLIS.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
XSPR.L
XLIS.L
Communication Services
XSPR.L
-
XLIS.L
-
Consumer Defensive
XSPR.L
-
XLIS.L
-
Energy
XSPR.L
-
XLIS.L
-
Financial Services
XSPR.L
-
XLIS.L
-
Healthcare
XSPR.L
-
XLIS.L
-
Industrials
XSPR.L
-
XLIS.L
Real Estate
XSPR.L
-
XLIS.L
Technology
XSPR.L
-
XLIS.L
Utilities
XSPR.L
-
XLIS.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XSPR.L vs. XLIS.L — Risk / Return Rank
XSPR.L
XLIS.L
XSPR.L vs. XLIS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Europe Materials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XSPR.L) and Invesco Industrials S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLIS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XSPR.L | XLIS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.29 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.59 | 2.65 | -2.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.23 | 8.30 | -7.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XSPR.L | XLIS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 | 1.67 | -1.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 0.79 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 | 0.74 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 0.74 | -0.59 |
Drawdowns
XSPR.L vs. XLIS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSPR.L drawdown since its inception was -68.41%, which is greater than XLIS.L's maximum drawdown of -35.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSPR.L and XLIS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSPR.L | XLIS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.41% | -35.19% | -33.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.78% | -9.16% | -9.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.78% | -21.01% | +2.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.71% | -21.01% | -2.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.80% | -35.19% | -6.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.87% | -1.05% | -3.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.82% | -4.48% | -16.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.06% | 2.92% | +6.14% |
Volatility
XSPR.L vs. XLIS.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI Europe Materials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XSPR.L) has a higher volatility of 6.25% compared to Invesco Industrials S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLIS.L) at 4.99%. This indicates that XSPR.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLIS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XSPR.L | XLIS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.25% | 4.99% | +1.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.25% | 11.63% | +2.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.45% | 14.56% | +11.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.23% | 16.97% | +6.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.15% | 19.06% | +9.09% |
XSPR.L vs. XLIS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSPR.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than XLIS.L's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XSPR.L vs. XLIS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XSPR.L nor XLIS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XSPR.L and XLIS.L have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLIS.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLIS.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XSPR.L.
XSPR.L tracks MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while XLIS.L tracks S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Industrials Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XSPR.L and 0.14% for XLIS.L.
Find the right allocation for XSPR.L and XLIS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer