XSPI vs. PEPS
XSPI (NEOS Boosted S&P 500 High Income ETF) and PEPS (Parametric Equity Plus ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. XSPI is passively managed, while PEPS is actively managed. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. XSPI charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for PEPS.
Performance
XSPI vs. PEPS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
XSPI
- 1D
- -0.89%
- 1M
- 5.09%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PEPS
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 6.44%
- YTD
- 10.67%
- 6M
- 10.79%
- 1Y
- 31.83%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XSPI vs. PEPS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
XSPI NEOS Boosted S&P 500 High Income ETF | 8.22% |
PEPS Parametric Equity Plus ETF | 8.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSPI and PEPS is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2026 | 0.96 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XSPI vs. PEPS — Risk / Return Rank
XSPI
PEPS
XSPI vs. PEPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Boosted S&P 500 High Income ETF (XSPI) and Parametric Equity Plus ETF (PEPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XSPI | PEPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.45 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.55 | 1.05 | +0.50 |
Drawdowns
XSPI vs. PEPS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSPI drawdown since its inception was -11.59%, smaller than the maximum PEPS drawdown of -21.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSPI and PEPS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSPI | PEPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.59% | -21.26% | +9.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.89% | -0.51% | -0.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.23% | -2.77% | +0.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.09% | — |
Volatility
XSPI vs. PEPS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XSPI | PEPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.77% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.83% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.64% | 13.06% | +4.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.64% | 18.31% | -0.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.64% | 18.31% | -0.67% |
XSPI vs. PEPS - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSPI has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than PEPS's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
XSPI vs. PEPS - Dividend Comparison
XSPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.83%, more than PEPS's 0.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
PEPS Parametric Equity Plus ETF | 0.88% | 1.00% | 0.17% |
XSPI NEOS Boosted S&P 500 High Income ETF | 6.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, XSPI and PEPS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, PEPS is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PEPS is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for XSPI.
XSPI has the higher dividend yield at 6.83%, compared with 0.88% for PEPS.
They also come from different issuers: NEOS Investments and Parametric. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for XSPI and 0.10% for PEPS.
Find the right allocation for XSPI and PEPS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer