XSPI vs. OMAH

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

XSPI (NEOS Boosted S&P 500 High Income ETF) and OMAH (VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. XSPI is passively managed, while OMAH is actively managed. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XSPI charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for OMAH.

Performance

XSPI vs. OMAH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Boosted S&P 500 High Income ETF (XSPI) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

XSPI

• 1D: -1.72%
• 1M: -1.90%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

OMAH

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: -1.97%
• YTD: 5.30%
• 6M: 5.12%
• 1Y: 11.47%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSPI vs. OMAH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
XSPI NEOS Boosted S&P 500 High Income ETF	3.95%
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	5.62%

Correlation

The correlation between XSPI and OMAH is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2026	0.37

Return for Risk

XSPI vs. OMAH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSPI

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

OMAH

OMAH Risk / Return Rank: 51
OMAH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
OMAH Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
OMAH Omega Ratio Rank: 40
OMAH Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
OMAH Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSPI vs. OMAH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Boosted S&P 500 High Income ETF (XSPI) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XSPI	OMAH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.44	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.01	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.25	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.84	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	9.13	—

Drawdowns

XSPI vs. OMAH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSPI drawdown since its inception was -11.78%, roughly equal to the maximum OMAH drawdown of -11.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSPI and OMAH.

Drawdown Indicators

	XSPI	OMAH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.78%	-11.83%	+0.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-3.00%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.70%	-1.97%	-1.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.41%	-1.27%	-1.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.26%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XSPI	OMAH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.21%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	5.58%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.76%	8.04%	+10.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.76%	13.03%	+5.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.76%	13.03%	+5.73%

XSPI vs. OMAH - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSPI has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than OMAH's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

XSPI vs. OMAH - Dividend Comparison

XSPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.03%, less than OMAH's 14.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	14.05%	12.86%
XSPI NEOS Boosted S&P 500 High Income ETF	7.03%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XSPI and OMAH in my portfolio?

XSPI and OMAH have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XSPI or OMAH?

On fees, OMAH is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XSPI or OMAH?

OMAH is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for XSPI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XSPI or OMAH?

OMAH has the higher dividend yield at 14.05%, compared with 7.03% for XSPI.

What is the main difference between XSPI and OMAH?

They also come from different issuers: NEOS Investments and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for XSPI and 0.95% for OMAH.